2019 Ranger III Regular Cab (facelift 2019)
2019 Ranger IV Raptor (Americas)
2019 Ranger IV SuperCrew (Americas)
2019 Ranger III Double Cab (facelift 2019)
2019 Ranger III Raptor (facelift 2019)
2019 Ranger IV SuperCab (Americas)
2019 Ranger III Super Cab (facelift 2019)
2015 Ranger III Double Cab (facelift 2015)
2015 Ranger III Single Cab (facelift 2015)
2015 Ranger III Super Cab (facelift 2015)
Ranger III Double Cab
Ranger III Super Cab
2009 Ranger II Super Cab (facelift 2009)
2009 Ranger II Double Cab (facelift 2009)
2006 Ranger II Super Cab
2006 Ranger II Double Cab
Ranger I Super Cab
Ranger I Double Cab
In 2019 Ford Ranger horsepower was 170 hp or 125 kW
Ford Ranger horsepower to weight ratio in 2019 is shown in the chart.
Ford Ranger horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 EcoBlue |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
+60% | 85 hp / 63 kw | 43 hp / 31 kw | 85 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBlue |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
Power to torque ratio | 60 % |
Power per passenger | 85 hp / 63 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 43 hp / 31 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 85 points |
In 2019 Ford Ranger horsepower was 214 hp or 157 kW
Ford Ranger horsepower to weight ratio in 2019 is shown in the chart.
Ford Ranger horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0d |
214 hp / 157 kw
(+24%) |
+57% | 43 hp / 31 kw | 54 hp / 39 kw | 107 points |
Vehicle | 2.0d |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
214 hp / 157 kw
(+24%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 43 hp / 31 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 54 hp / 39 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 107 points |
In 2019 Ford Ranger horsepower was 270 hp or 199 kW
Ford Ranger horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.3 EcoBoost |
270 hp / 199 kw
(+56%) |
+36% | 54 hp / 40 kw | 68 hp / 50 kw | 117.4 points |
Vehicle | 2.3 EcoBoost |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
270 hp / 199 kw
(+56%) |
Power to torque ratio | 36 % |
Power per passenger | 54 hp / 40 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 68 hp / 50 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 117.4 points |
In 2019 Ford Ranger horsepower was between 170 and 200 hp or 125 and 147 kW.
Ford Ranger horsepower to weight ratio in 2019 is shown in the chart.
Ford Ranger horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.2 Duratorq TDCi |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
+57% | 40 hp / 29 kw | 40 hp / 29 kw | 62.5 points |
2.0 EcoBlue |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
+60% | 34 hp / 25 kw | 43 hp / 31 kw | 85 points |
Vehicle | 3.2 Duratorq TDCi |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 62.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBlue |
Power (difference from average) |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
Power to torque ratio | 60 % |
Power per passenger | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 43 hp / 31 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 85 points |
In 2019 Ford Ranger horsepower was 213 hp or 157 kW
Ford Ranger horsepower to weight ratio in 2019 is shown in the chart.
Ford Ranger horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 EcoBlue |
213 hp / 157 kw
(+23%) |
+57% | 43 hp / 31 kw | 53 hp / 39 kw | 106.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBlue |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
213 hp / 157 kw
(+23%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 43 hp / 31 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 53 hp / 39 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 106.5 points |
In 2019 Ford Ranger horsepower was 270 hp or 199 kW
Ford Ranger horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.3 EcoBoost |
270 hp / 199 kw
(+56%) |
+36% | 54 hp / 40 kw | 68 hp / 50 kw | 117.4 points |
Vehicle | 2.3 EcoBoost |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
270 hp / 199 kw
(+56%) |
Power to torque ratio | 36 % |
Power per passenger | 54 hp / 40 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 68 hp / 50 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 117.4 points |
In 2019 Ford Ranger horsepower was 170 hp or 125 kW
Ford Ranger horsepower to weight ratio in 2019 is shown in the chart.
Ford Ranger horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 EcoBlue |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
+60% | 43 hp / 31 kw | 43 hp / 31 kw | 85 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBlue |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
Power to torque ratio | 60 % |
Power per passenger | 43 hp / 31 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 43 hp / 31 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 85 points |
In 2015 Ford Ranger horsepower was between 160 and 200 hp or 118 and 147 kW.
Ford Ranger horsepower to weight ratio in 2015 is shown in the chart.
Ford Ranger horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2 TDCi |
160 hp / 118 kw
(-8%) |
+58% | 32 hp / 24 kw | 40 hp / 30 kw | 72.7 points |
3.2 TDCi |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
+57% | 40 hp / 29 kw | 40 hp / 29 kw | 62.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.2 TDCi |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
160 hp / 118 kw
(-8%) |
Power to torque ratio | 58 % |
Power per passenger | 32 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 40 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 72.7 points |
Vehicle | 3.2 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 62.5 points |
In 2015 Ford Ranger horsepower was between 130 and 200 hp or 96 and 147 kW.
Ford Ranger horsepower to weight ratio in 2015 is shown in the chart.
Ford Ranger horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 |
166 hp / 122 kw
(-4%) |
+27% | 83 hp / 61 kw | 42 hp / 31 kw | 66.4 points |
2.2 TDCi |
130 hp / 96 kw
(-25%) |
+61% | 65 hp / 48 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 59.1 points |
3.2 TDCi |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
+57% | 100 hp / 74 kw | 40 hp / 29 kw | 62.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
166 hp / 122 kw
(-4%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 83 hp / 61 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 42 hp / 31 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 66.4 points |
Vehicle | 2.2 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
130 hp / 96 kw
(-25%) |
Power to torque ratio | 61 % |
Power per passenger | 65 hp / 48 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 59.1 points |
Vehicle | 3.2 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 100 hp / 74 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 62.5 points |
In 2015 Ford Ranger horsepower was between 130 and 200 hp or 96 and 147 kW.
Ford Ranger horsepower to weight ratio in 2015 is shown in the chart.
Ford Ranger horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.2 TDCi |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
+57% | 40 hp / 29 kw | 40 hp / 29 kw | 62.5 points |
2.2 TDCi |
130 hp / 96 kw
(-25%) |
+61% | 26 hp / 19 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 59.1 points |
Vehicle | 3.2 TDCi |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 62.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.2 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
130 hp / 96 kw
(-25%) |
Power to torque ratio | 61 % |
Power per passenger | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 59.1 points |
In Ranger Ford Ranger horsepower was between 125 and 200 hp or 92 and 147 kW.
Ford Ranger horsepower to weight ratio in Ranger is shown in the chart.
Ford Ranger horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.2 TDCi |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
+57% | 40 hp / 29 kw | 40 hp / 29 kw | 62.5 points |
2.5 |
166 hp / 122 kw
(-4%) |
+27% | 33 hp / 24 kw | 42 hp / 31 kw | 66.4 points |
2.2 TDCi |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
+61% | 25 hp / 18 kw | 31 hp / 23 kw | 56.8 points |
Vehicle | 3.2 TDCi |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 62.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 |
Power (difference from average) |
166 hp / 122 kw
(-4%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 42 hp / 31 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 66.4 points |
Vehicle | 2.2 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
Power to torque ratio | 61 % |
Power per passenger | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 31 hp / 23 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 56.8 points |
In Ranger Ford Ranger horsepower was between 150 and 200 hp or 110 and 147 kW.
Ford Ranger horsepower to weight ratio in Ranger is shown in the chart.
Ford Ranger horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2 TDCi |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+60% | 30 hp / 22 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 68.2 points |
3.2 TDCi |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
+57% | 40 hp / 29 kw | 40 hp / 29 kw | 62.5 points |
2.5 |
166 hp / 122 kw
(-4%) |
+27% | 33 hp / 24 kw | 42 hp / 31 kw | 66.4 points |
Vehicle | 2.2 TDCi |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 60 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68.2 points |
Vehicle | 3.2 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 62.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 |
Power (difference from average) |
166 hp / 122 kw
(-4%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 42 hp / 31 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 66.4 points |
In 2009 Ford Ranger horsepower was 143 hp or 105 kW
Ford Ranger horsepower to weight ratio in 2009 is shown in the chart.
Ford Ranger horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 TDCi |
143 hp / 105 kw
(-17%) |
+57% | 36 hp / 26 kw | 36 hp / 26 kw | 57.2 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 TDCi |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
143 hp / 105 kw
(-17%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 57.2 points |
In 2009 Ford Ranger horsepower was 143 hp or 105 kW
Ford Ranger horsepower to weight ratio in 2009 is shown in the chart.
Ford Ranger horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 TDCi |
143 hp / 105 kw
(-17%) |
+57% | 29 hp / 21 kw | 36 hp / 26 kw | 57.2 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 TDCi |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
143 hp / 105 kw
(-17%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 57.2 points |
In 2006 Ford Ranger horsepower was between 143 and 207 hp or 105 and 152 kW.
Ford Ranger horsepower to weight ratio in 2006 is shown in the chart.
Ford Ranger horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 TDCi |
143 hp / 105 kw
(-17%) |
+57% | 36 hp / 26 kw | 36 hp / 26 kw | 57.2 points |
3.0 TDCi |
156 hp / 115 kw
(-10%) |
+59% | 39 hp / 29 kw | 39 hp / 29 kw | 52 points |
2.3 |
143 hp / 105 kw
(-17%) |
+32% | 36 hp / 26 kw | 36 hp / 26 kw | 62.2 points |
4.0 V6 |
207 hp / 152 kw
(+20%) |
+36% | 52 hp / 38 kw | 35 hp / 25 kw | 51.8 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 TDCi |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
143 hp / 105 kw
(-17%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 57.2 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
156 hp / 115 kw
(-10%) |
Power to torque ratio | 59 % |
Power per passenger | 39 hp / 29 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 39 hp / 29 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 52 points |
Vehicle | 2.3 |
Power (difference from average) |
143 hp / 105 kw
(-17%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 62.2 points |
Vehicle | 4.0 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
207 hp / 152 kw
(+20%) |
Power to torque ratio | 36 % |
Power per passenger | 52 hp / 38 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 51.8 points |
In 2006 Ford Ranger horsepower was between 143 and 207 hp or 105 and 152 kW.
Ford Ranger horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.0 TDCi |
156 hp / 115 kw
(-10%) |
+59% | 31 hp / 23 kw | 39 hp / 29 kw | 52 points |
2.5 TDCi |
143 hp / 105 kw
(-17%) |
+57% | 29 hp / 21 kw | 36 hp / 26 kw | 57.2 points |
4.0 V6 |
207 hp / 152 kw
(+20%) |
+36% | 41 hp / 30 kw | 35 hp / 25 kw | 51.8 points |
2.3 |
143 hp / 105 kw
(-17%) |
+32% | 29 hp / 21 kw | 36 hp / 26 kw | 62.2 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 TDCi |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
156 hp / 115 kw
(-10%) |
Power to torque ratio | 59 % |
Power per passenger | 31 hp / 23 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 39 hp / 29 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 52 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
143 hp / 105 kw
(-17%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 57.2 points |
Vehicle | 4.0 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
207 hp / 152 kw
(+20%) |
Power to torque ratio | 36 % |
Power per passenger | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 51.8 points |
Vehicle | 2.3 |
Power (difference from average) |
143 hp / 105 kw
(-17%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 62.2 points |
In Ranger Ford Ranger horsepower was between 109 and 207 hp or 80 and 152 kW.
Ford Ranger horsepower to weight ratio in Ranger is shown in the chart.
Ford Ranger horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.3 |
143 hp / 105 kw
(-17%) |
+32% | 36 hp / 26 kw | 36 hp / 26 kw | 62.2 points |
2.5 TDCi |
109 hp / 80 kw
(-37%) |
+59% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 43.6 points |
3.0 V6 |
154 hp / 113 kw
(-11%) |
- | 39 hp / 28 kw | 26 hp / 19 kw | - |
4.0 V6 |
207 hp / 152 kw
(+20%) |
+36% | 52 hp / 38 kw | 35 hp / 25 kw | 51.8 points |
Vehicle | 2.3 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
143 hp / 105 kw
(-17%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 62.2 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
109 hp / 80 kw
(-37%) |
Power to torque ratio | 59 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 43.6 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
154 hp / 113 kw
(-11%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 39 hp / 28 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 4.0 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
207 hp / 152 kw
(+20%) |
Power to torque ratio | 36 % |
Power per passenger | 52 hp / 38 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 51.8 points |
In Ranger Ford Ranger horsepower was 109 hp or 80 kW
Ford Ranger horsepower to weight ratio in Ranger is shown in the chart.
Ford Ranger horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 TDCi |
109 hp / 80 kw
(-37%) |
+59% | 22 hp / 16 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 43.6 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 TDCi |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
109 hp / 80 kw
(-37%) |
Power to torque ratio | 59 % |
Power per passenger | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 43.6 points |