In 2017 Ford Mustang horsepower was between 310 and 460 hp or 228 and 338 kW.
Ford Mustang horsepower to weight ratio in 2017 is shown in the chart.
Ford Mustang horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.3 GTDi EcoBoost |
310 hp / 228 kw
(+79%) |
+35% | 78 hp / 57 kw | 78 hp / 57 kw | 134.8 points |
GT 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 |
460 hp / 338 kw
(+166%) |
+19% | 115 hp / 85 kw | 58 hp / 42 kw | 93.9 points |
Vehicle | 2.3 GTDi EcoBoost |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
310 hp / 228 kw
(+79%) |
Power to torque ratio | 35 % |
Power per passenger | 78 hp / 57 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 78 hp / 57 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 134.8 points |
Vehicle | GT 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
460 hp / 338 kw
(+166%) |
Power to torque ratio | 19 % |
Power per passenger | 115 hp / 85 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 58 hp / 42 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 93.9 points |
In 2017 Ford Mustang horsepower was between 310 and 760 hp or 228 and 559 kW.
Ford Mustang horsepower to weight ratio in 2017 is shown in the chart.
Ford Mustang horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.3 GTDi EcoBoost |
310 hp / 228 kw
(+79%) |
+35% | 78 hp / 57 kw | 78 hp / 57 kw | 134.8 points |
Shelby GT500 V8 |
760 hp / 559 kw
(+339%) |
+10% | 190 hp / 140 kw | 95 hp / 70 kw | 146.2 points |
BULLITT 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 |
480 hp / 353 kw
(+177%) |
+16% | 120 hp / 88 kw | 60 hp / 44 kw | 96 points |
GT 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 |
460 hp / 338 kw
(+166%) |
+19% | 115 hp / 85 kw | 58 hp / 42 kw | 93.9 points |
Shelby GT350 R 5.2 V8 |
526 hp / 387 kw
(+204%) |
+10% | 263 hp / 194 kw | 66 hp / 48 kw | 101.2 points |
Shelby GT350 5.2 V8 |
526 hp / 387 kw
(+204%) |
+10% | 263 hp / 194 kw | 66 hp / 48 kw | 101.2 points |
Vehicle | 2.3 GTDi EcoBoost |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
310 hp / 228 kw
(+79%) |
Power to torque ratio | 35 % |
Power per passenger | 78 hp / 57 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 78 hp / 57 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 134.8 points |
Vehicle | Shelby GT500 V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
760 hp / 559 kw
(+339%) |
Power to torque ratio | 10 % |
Power per passenger | 190 hp / 140 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 95 hp / 70 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 146.2 points |
Vehicle | BULLITT 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
480 hp / 353 kw
(+177%) |
Power to torque ratio | 16 % |
Power per passenger | 120 hp / 88 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 60 hp / 44 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 96 points |
Vehicle | GT 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
460 hp / 338 kw
(+166%) |
Power to torque ratio | 19 % |
Power per passenger | 115 hp / 85 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 58 hp / 42 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 93.9 points |
Vehicle | Shelby GT350 R 5.2 V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
526 hp / 387 kw
(+204%) |
Power to torque ratio | 10 % |
Power per passenger | 263 hp / 194 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 66 hp / 48 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 101.2 points |
Vehicle | Shelby GT350 5.2 V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
526 hp / 387 kw
(+204%) |
Power to torque ratio | 10 % |
Power per passenger | 263 hp / 194 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 66 hp / 48 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 101.2 points |
In 2015 Ford Mustang horsepower was between 304 and 426 hp or 224 and 313 kW.
Ford Mustang horsepower to weight ratio in 2015 is shown in the chart.
Ford Mustang horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.3 EcoBoost |
309 hp / 227 kw
(+79%) |
+24% | 77 hp / 57 kw | 77 hp / 57 kw | 134.3 points |
GT 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 |
421 hp / 310 kw
(+143%) |
+21% | 105 hp / 78 kw | 53 hp / 39 kw | 84.2 points |
3.7 V6 |
304 hp / 224 kw
(+76%) |
+17% | 76 hp / 56 kw | 51 hp / 37 kw | 82.2 points |
GT 5.0 V8 |
426 hp / 313 kw
(+146%) |
+19% | 107 hp / 78 kw | 53 hp / 39 kw | 85.2 points |
Vehicle | 2.3 EcoBoost |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
309 hp / 227 kw
(+79%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 77 hp / 57 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 77 hp / 57 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 134.3 points |
Vehicle | GT 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
421 hp / 310 kw
(+143%) |
Power to torque ratio | 21 % |
Power per passenger | 105 hp / 78 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 53 hp / 39 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 84.2 points |
Vehicle | 3.7 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
304 hp / 224 kw
(+76%) |
Power to torque ratio | 17 % |
Power per passenger | 76 hp / 56 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 51 hp / 37 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 82.2 points |
Vehicle | GT 5.0 V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
426 hp / 313 kw
(+146%) |
Power to torque ratio | 19 % |
Power per passenger | 107 hp / 78 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 53 hp / 39 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 85.2 points |
In 2015 Ford Mustang horsepower was between 304 and 426 hp or 224 and 313 kW.
Ford Mustang horsepower to weight ratio in 2015 is shown in the chart.
Ford Mustang horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.3 EcoBoost |
309 hp / 227 kw
(+79%) |
+24% | 77 hp / 57 kw | 77 hp / 57 kw | 134.3 points |
GT 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 |
421 hp / 310 kw
(+143%) |
+21% | 105 hp / 78 kw | 53 hp / 39 kw | 84.2 points |
GT 5.0 V8 |
426 hp / 313 kw
(+146%) |
+19% | 107 hp / 78 kw | 53 hp / 39 kw | 85.2 points |
3.7 V6 |
304 hp / 224 kw
(+76%) |
+17% | 76 hp / 56 kw | 51 hp / 37 kw | 82.2 points |
Vehicle | 2.3 EcoBoost |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
309 hp / 227 kw
(+79%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 77 hp / 57 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 77 hp / 57 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 134.3 points |
Vehicle | GT 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
421 hp / 310 kw
(+143%) |
Power to torque ratio | 21 % |
Power per passenger | 105 hp / 78 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 53 hp / 39 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 84.2 points |
Vehicle | GT 5.0 V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
426 hp / 313 kw
(+146%) |
Power to torque ratio | 19 % |
Power per passenger | 107 hp / 78 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 53 hp / 39 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 85.2 points |
Vehicle | 3.7 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
304 hp / 224 kw
(+76%) |
Power to torque ratio | 17 % |
Power per passenger | 76 hp / 56 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 51 hp / 37 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 82.2 points |
In 2005 Ford Mustang horsepower was between 212 and 304 hp or 156 and 224 kW.
Ford Mustang horsepower to weight ratio in 2005 is shown in the chart.
Ford Mustang horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.6 i V8 24V |
304 hp / 224 kw
(+76%) |
+30% | 76 hp / 56 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 66.1 points |
4.0 i V6 12V |
212 hp / 156 kw
(+23%) |
+35% | 53 hp / 39 kw | 35 hp / 26 kw | 53 points |
Vehicle | 4.6 i V8 24V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
304 hp / 224 kw
(+76%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 76 hp / 56 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 66.1 points |
Vehicle | 4.0 i V6 12V |
Power (difference from average) |
212 hp / 156 kw
(+23%) |
Power to torque ratio | 35 % |
Power per passenger | 53 hp / 39 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 53 points |
In 2005 Ford Mustang horsepower was between 205 and 305 hp or 151 and 224 kW.
Ford Mustang horsepower to weight ratio in 2005 is shown in the chart.
Ford Mustang horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.0i V6 |
205 hp / 151 kw
(+18%) |
+36% | 51 hp / 38 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 51.3 points |
4.0i V6 12V |
212 hp / 156 kw
(+23%) |
+35% | 53 hp / 39 kw | 35 hp / 26 kw | 53 points |
GT 4.6i V8 |
304 hp / 224 kw
(+76%) |
+29% | 76 hp / 56 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 66.1 points |
4.0 i V6 |
305 hp / 224 kw
(+76%) |
- | 76 hp / 56 kw | 51 hp / 37 kw | 82.4 points |
Vehicle | 4.0i V6 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
205 hp / 151 kw
(+18%) |
Power to torque ratio | 36 % |
Power per passenger | 51 hp / 38 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 51.3 points |
Vehicle | 4.0i V6 12V |
Power (difference from average) |
212 hp / 156 kw
(+23%) |
Power to torque ratio | 35 % |
Power per passenger | 53 hp / 39 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 53 points |
Vehicle | GT 4.6i V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
304 hp / 224 kw
(+76%) |
Power to torque ratio | 29 % |
Power per passenger | 76 hp / 56 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 66.1 points |
Vehicle | 4.0 i V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
305 hp / 224 kw
(+76%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 76 hp / 56 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 51 hp / 37 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 82.4 points |
In 1994 Ford Mustang horsepower was between 147 and 390 hp or 108 and 287 kW.
Ford Mustang horsepower to weight ratio in 1994 is shown in the chart.
Ford Mustang horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R |
390 hp / 287 kw
(+125%) |
+26% | 195 hp / 144 kw | 49 hp / 36 kw | 84.8 points |
3.8 V6 |
147 hp / 108 kw
(-15%) |
+50% | 74 hp / 54 kw | 25 hp / 18 kw | 38.7 points |
4.6 V8 GT |
263 hp / 193 kw
(+52%) |
+13% | 132 hp / 97 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 57.2 points |
5.0 GT |
218 hp / 160 kw
(+26%) |
+44% | 109 hp / 80 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 44.5 points |
3.8 V6 GT |
152 hp / 112 kw
(-12%) |
+48% | 76 hp / 56 kw | 25 hp / 19 kw | 40 points |
4.6 V8 32V Cobra |
324 hp / 238 kw
(+87%) |
+25% | 162 hp / 119 kw | 41 hp / 30 kw | 70.4 points |
Vehicle | 4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
390 hp / 287 kw
(+125%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 195 hp / 144 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 49 hp / 36 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 84.8 points |
Vehicle | 3.8 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
147 hp / 108 kw
(-15%) |
Power to torque ratio | 50 % |
Power per passenger | 74 hp / 54 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 38.7 points |
Vehicle | 4.6 V8 GT |
Power (difference from average) |
263 hp / 193 kw
(+52%) |
Power to torque ratio | 13 % |
Power per passenger | 132 hp / 97 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 57.2 points |
Vehicle | 5.0 GT |
Power (difference from average) |
218 hp / 160 kw
(+26%) |
Power to torque ratio | 44 % |
Power per passenger | 109 hp / 80 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 44.5 points |
Vehicle | 3.8 V6 GT |
Power (difference from average) |
152 hp / 112 kw
(-12%) |
Power to torque ratio | 48 % |
Power per passenger | 76 hp / 56 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 25 hp / 19 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 40 points |
Vehicle | 4.6 V8 32V Cobra |
Power (difference from average) |
324 hp / 238 kw
(+87%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 162 hp / 119 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70.4 points |
In 1994 Ford Mustang horsepower was between 152 and 390 hp or 112 and 287 kW.
Ford Mustang horsepower to weight ratio in 1994 is shown in the chart.
Ford Mustang horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5.0 GT |
218 hp / 160 kw
(+26%) |
+44% | 109 hp / 80 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 44.5 points |
4.6 V8 GT |
263 hp / 193 kw
(+52%) |
+13% | 132 hp / 97 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 57.2 points |
4.6 V8 Cobra |
305 hp / 224 kw
(+76%) |
+25% | 153 hp / 112 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 66.3 points |
4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R |
390 hp / 287 kw
(+125%) |
+26% | 195 hp / 144 kw | 49 hp / 36 kw | 84.8 points |
4.6 V8 32V Cobra |
320 hp / 235 kw
(+85%) |
+26% | 160 hp / 118 kw | 40 hp / 29 kw | 69.6 points |
4.6i V8 32V Mach I |
305 hp / 224 kw
(+76%) |
+30% | 153 hp / 112 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 66.3 points |
3.8 V6 |
152 hp / 112 kw
(-12%) |
+48% | 76 hp / 56 kw | 25 hp / 19 kw | 40 points |
Vehicle | 5.0 GT |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
218 hp / 160 kw
(+26%) |
Power to torque ratio | 44 % |
Power per passenger | 109 hp / 80 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 44.5 points |
Vehicle | 4.6 V8 GT |
Power (difference from average) |
263 hp / 193 kw
(+52%) |
Power to torque ratio | 13 % |
Power per passenger | 132 hp / 97 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 57.2 points |
Vehicle | 4.6 V8 Cobra |
Power (difference from average) |
305 hp / 224 kw
(+76%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 153 hp / 112 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 66.3 points |
Vehicle | 4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R |
Power (difference from average) |
390 hp / 287 kw
(+125%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 195 hp / 144 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 49 hp / 36 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 84.8 points |
Vehicle | 4.6 V8 32V Cobra |
Power (difference from average) |
320 hp / 235 kw
(+85%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 160 hp / 118 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 69.6 points |
Vehicle | 4.6i V8 32V Mach I |
Power (difference from average) |
305 hp / 224 kw
(+76%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 153 hp / 112 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 66.3 points |
Vehicle | 3.8 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
152 hp / 112 kw
(-12%) |
Power to torque ratio | 48 % |
Power per passenger | 76 hp / 56 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 25 hp / 19 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 40 points |
In 1979 Ford Mustang horsepower was between 106 and 228 hp or 78 and 168 kW.
Ford Mustang horsepower to weight ratio in 1979 is shown in the chart.
Ford Mustang horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.9 V8 |
228 hp / 168 kw
(+32%) |
+44% | 114 hp / 84 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 46.5 points |
2.3i |
106 hp / 78 kw
(-39%) |
+42% | 53 hp / 39 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 46.1 points |
Vehicle | 4.9 V8 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
228 hp / 168 kw
(+32%) |
Power to torque ratio | 44 % |
Power per passenger | 114 hp / 84 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 46.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.3i |
Power (difference from average) |
106 hp / 78 kw
(-39%) |
Power to torque ratio | 42 % |
Power per passenger | 53 hp / 39 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 46.1 points |
In 1979 Ford Mustang horsepower was between 106 and 228 hp or 78 and 168 kW.
Ford Mustang horsepower to weight ratio in 1979 is shown in the chart.
Ford Mustang horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.3i |
106 hp / 78 kw
(-39%) |
+42% | 53 hp / 39 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 46.1 points |
4.9 V8 |
228 hp / 168 kw
(+32%) |
+44% | 114 hp / 84 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 46.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.3i |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
106 hp / 78 kw
(-39%) |
Power to torque ratio | 42 % |
Power per passenger | 53 hp / 39 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 46.1 points |
Vehicle | 4.9 V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
228 hp / 168 kw
(+32%) |
Power to torque ratio | 44 % |
Power per passenger | 114 hp / 84 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 46.5 points |
In Mustang Ford Mustang horsepower was between 101 and 210 hp or 74 and 154 kW.
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.7 V8 |
210 hp / 154 kw
(+21%) |
- | - | - | |
4.2 V8 |
164 hp / 121 kw
(-5%) |
- | - | - | |
2.8 V6 |
101 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
- | - | - |
Vehicle | 4.7 V8 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
210 hp / 154 kw
(+21%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 4.2 V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
164 hp / 121 kw
(-5%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.8 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
101 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
In Mustang Ford Mustang horsepower was between 101 and 271 hp or 74 and 199 kW.
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.8 v6 |
101 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
- | - | - | |
4.2 V8 |
164 hp / 121 kw
(-5%) |
- | - | - | |
4.7 V8 |
271 hp / 199 kw
(+57%) |
- | - | - |
Vehicle | 2.8 v6 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
101 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 4.2 V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
164 hp / 121 kw
(-5%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 4.7 V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
271 hp / 199 kw
(+57%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |