2019 Mondeo IV Hatchback (facelift 2019)
2019 Mondeo IV Sedan (facelift 2019)
Mondeo Wagon IV (facelift 2019)
Mondeo Sedan IV
Mondeo Hatchback IV
Mondeo Wagon IV
Mondeo Hatchback III (facelift 2010)
Mondeo Wagon III (facelift 2010)
Mondeo Hatchback III
Mondeo Wagon III
Mondeo Sedan III
Mondeo Sedan II
Mondeo Hatchback II
Mondeo Wagon II
Mondeo Wagon I (facelift 1996)
Mondeo Seadn I (facelift 1996)
Mondeo Hatchback I (facelift 1996)
Mondeo Wagon I
Mondeo Hatchback I
Mondeo Sedan I
In 2019 Ford Mondeo horsepower was between 150 and 165 hp or 110 and 121 kW.
Ford Mondeo horsepower to weight ratio in 2019 is shown in the chart.
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 EcoBlue |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+59% | 30 hp / 22 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | - |
1.5 EcoBoost |
165 hp / 121 kw
(-5%) |
+32% | 33 hp / 24 kw | - | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBlue |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 59 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.5 EcoBoost |
Power (difference from average) |
165 hp / 121 kw
(-5%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
In 2019 Ford Mondeo horsepower was 187 hp or 138 kW
Ford Mondeo horsepower to weight ratio in 2019 is shown in the chart.
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
187 hp / 138 kw
(+8%) |
+-8% | 37 hp / 28 kw | - | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
187 hp / 138 kw
(+8%) |
Power to torque ratio | -8 % |
Power per passenger | 37 hp / 28 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
In Mondeo Ford Mondeo horsepower was between 150 and 187 hp or 110 and 138 kW.
Ford Mondeo horsepower to weight ratio in Mondeo is shown in the chart.
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 EcoBlue |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+59% | 30 hp / 22 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | - |
1.5 EcoBoost |
165 hp / 121 kw
(-5%) |
+32% | 33 hp / 24 kw | 41 hp / 30 kw | - |
2.0 |
187 hp / 138 kw
(+8%) |
+-8% | 37 hp / 28 kw | - | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBlue |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 59 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.5 EcoBoost |
Power (difference from average) |
165 hp / 121 kw
(-5%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Power (difference from average) |
187 hp / 138 kw
(+8%) |
Power to torque ratio | -8 % |
Power per passenger | 37 hp / 28 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
In Mondeo Ford Mondeo horsepower was between 115 and 203 hp or 85 and 149 kW.
Ford Mondeo horsepower to weight ratio in Mondeo is shown in the chart.
Ford Mondeo horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 TDCi |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+57% | 30 hp / 22 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 75 points |
1.6 TDCi |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+57% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 71.9 points |
1.5 TDCi |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
+56% | 24 hp / 18 kw | 30 hp / 22 kw | 80 points |
1.5 EcoBoost |
160 hp / 118 kw
(-8%) |
+33% | 32 hp / 24 kw | 40 hp / 30 kw | 106.7 points |
2.0 EcoBoost |
203 hp / 149 kw
(+17%) |
+41% | 41 hp / 30 kw | 51 hp / 37 kw | 101.5 points |
2.0 iVCT |
187 hp / 138 kw
(+8%) |
- | 37 hp / 28 kw | 47 hp / 35 kw | 93.5 points |
1.0 EcoBoost |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
+26% | 25 hp / 18 kw | 42 hp / 31 kw | 125 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDCi |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 71.9 points |
Vehicle | 1.5 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 80 points |
Vehicle | 1.5 EcoBoost |
Power (difference from average) |
160 hp / 118 kw
(-8%) |
Power to torque ratio | 33 % |
Power per passenger | 32 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 40 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 106.7 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBoost |
Power (difference from average) |
203 hp / 149 kw
(+17%) |
Power to torque ratio | 41 % |
Power per passenger | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 51 hp / 37 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 101.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 iVCT |
Power (difference from average) |
187 hp / 138 kw
(+8%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 37 hp / 28 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 47 hp / 35 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 93.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.0 EcoBoost |
Power (difference from average) |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 42 hp / 31 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 125 points |
In Mondeo Ford Mondeo horsepower was between 115 and 240 hp or 85 and 177 kW.
Ford Mondeo horsepower to weight ratio in Mondeo is shown in the chart.
Ford Mondeo horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.0 EcoBoost |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
+26% | 25 hp / 18 kw | 42 hp / 31 kw | 125 points |
2.0 TDCi |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+57% | 30 hp / 22 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 75 points |
2.0 EcoBoost |
240 hp / 177 kw
(+39%) |
+30% | 48 hp / 35 kw | 60 hp / 44 kw | 120 points |
1.6 TDCi |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+57% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 71.9 points |
1.5 TDCi |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
+56% | 24 hp / 18 kw | 30 hp / 22 kw | 80 points |
1.5 EcoBoost |
160 hp / 118 kw
(-8%) |
+33% | 32 hp / 24 kw | 40 hp / 30 kw | 106.7 points |
Vehicle | 1.0 EcoBoost |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 42 hp / 31 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 125 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBoost |
Power (difference from average) |
240 hp / 177 kw
(+39%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 48 hp / 35 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 60 hp / 44 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 120 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 71.9 points |
Vehicle | 1.5 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 80 points |
Vehicle | 1.5 EcoBoost |
Power (difference from average) |
160 hp / 118 kw
(-8%) |
Power to torque ratio | 33 % |
Power per passenger | 32 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 40 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 106.7 points |
In Mondeo Ford Mondeo horsepower was between 115 and 240 hp or 85 and 177 kW.
Ford Mondeo horsepower to weight ratio in Mondeo is shown in the chart.
Ford Mondeo horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 TDCi |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+57% | 30 hp / 22 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 75 points |
1.5 EcoBoost |
160 hp / 118 kw
(-8%) |
+33% | 32 hp / 24 kw | 40 hp / 30 kw | 106.7 points |
1.5 TDCi |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
+56% | 24 hp / 18 kw | 30 hp / 22 kw | 80 points |
2.0 EcoBoost |
240 hp / 177 kw
(+39%) |
+30% | 48 hp / 35 kw | 60 hp / 44 kw | 120 points |
1.6 TDCi |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+57% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 71.9 points |
1.0 EcoBoost |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
+26% | 25 hp / 18 kw | 42 hp / 31 kw | 125 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDCi |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75 points |
Vehicle | 1.5 EcoBoost |
Power (difference from average) |
160 hp / 118 kw
(-8%) |
Power to torque ratio | 33 % |
Power per passenger | 32 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 40 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 106.7 points |
Vehicle | 1.5 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 80 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBoost |
Power (difference from average) |
240 hp / 177 kw
(+39%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 48 hp / 35 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 60 hp / 44 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 120 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 71.9 points |
Vehicle | 1.0 EcoBoost |
Power (difference from average) |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 42 hp / 31 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 125 points |
In Mondeo Ford Mondeo horsepower was between 120 and 240 hp or 88 and 177 kW.
Ford Mondeo horsepower to weight ratio in Mondeo is shown in the chart.
Ford Mondeo horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 TDCI |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
+56% | 28 hp / 21 kw | 35 hp / 26 kw | 70 points |
2.0 16V |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
+24% | 29 hp / 21 kw | 36 hp / 27 kw | 72.5 points |
2.0 EcoBoost |
240 hp / 177 kw
(+39%) |
+29% | 48 hp / 35 kw | 60 hp / 44 kw | 120 points |
1.6 16V |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
+25% | 24 hp / 18 kw | 30 hp / 22 kw | 75 points |
2.2 TDCI |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
+52% | 40 hp / 29 kw | 50 hp / 37 kw | 90.9 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDCI |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 72.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBoost |
Power (difference from average) |
240 hp / 177 kw
(+39%) |
Power to torque ratio | 29 % |
Power per passenger | 48 hp / 35 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 60 hp / 44 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 120 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75 points |
Vehicle | 2.2 TDCI |
Power (difference from average) |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 52 % |
Power per passenger | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 50 hp / 37 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 90.9 points |
In Mondeo Ford Mondeo horsepower was between 120 and 203 hp or 88 and 149 kW.
Ford Mondeo horsepower to weight ratio in Mondeo is shown in the chart.
Ford Mondeo horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 TDCI |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
+52% | 33 hp / 24 kw | 41 hp / 30 kw | 81.5 points |
1.6 16V |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
+25% | 24 hp / 18 kw | 30 hp / 22 kw | 75 points |
2.0 EcoBoost |
203 hp / 149 kw
(+17%) |
+32% | 41 hp / 30 kw | 51 hp / 37 kw | 101.5 points |
2.2 TDCI |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
+52% | 40 hp / 29 kw | 50 hp / 37 kw | 90.9 points |
2.0 16V |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
+24% | 29 hp / 21 kw | 36 hp / 27 kw | 72.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDCI |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
Power to torque ratio | 52 % |
Power per passenger | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 81.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBoost |
Power (difference from average) |
203 hp / 149 kw
(+17%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 51 hp / 37 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 101.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.2 TDCI |
Power (difference from average) |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 52 % |
Power per passenger | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 50 hp / 37 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 90.9 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 72.5 points |
In Mondeo Ford Mondeo horsepower was between 110 and 220 hp or 81 and 162 kW.
Ford Mondeo horsepower to weight ratio in Mondeo is shown in the chart.
Ford Mondeo horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 TDCi |
130 hp / 96 kw
(-25%) |
+59% | 26 hp / 19 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 65 points |
2.5 i 20V |
220 hp / 162 kw
(+27%) |
+31% | 44 hp / 32 kw | 44 hp / 32 kw | 88 points |
1.6i 16v |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
+22% | 25 hp / 18 kw | 31 hp / 23 kw | 78.1 points |
1.6 i 16V |
110 hp / 81 kw
(-36%) |
+20% | 22 hp / 16 kw | 28 hp / 20 kw | 68.8 points |
2.2 TDCi |
175 hp / 129 kw
(+1%) |
+56% | 35 hp / 26 kw | 44 hp / 32 kw | 79.5 points |
2.0 i 16V |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
+24% | 29 hp / 21 kw | 36 hp / 27 kw | 72.5 points |
2.3 i 16V |
160 hp / 118 kw
(-8%) |
+23% | 32 hp / 24 kw | 40 hp / 30 kw | 69.6 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDCi |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
130 hp / 96 kw
(-25%) |
Power to torque ratio | 59 % |
Power per passenger | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 65 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 i 20V |
Power (difference from average) |
220 hp / 162 kw
(+27%) |
Power to torque ratio | 31 % |
Power per passenger | 44 hp / 32 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 44 hp / 32 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 88 points |
Vehicle | 1.6i 16v |
Power (difference from average) |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
Power to torque ratio | 22 % |
Power per passenger | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 31 hp / 23 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 78.1 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
110 hp / 81 kw
(-36%) |
Power to torque ratio | 20 % |
Power per passenger | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68.8 points |
Vehicle | 2.2 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
175 hp / 129 kw
(+1%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 44 hp / 32 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 79.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 72.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.3 i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
160 hp / 118 kw
(-8%) |
Power to torque ratio | 23 % |
Power per passenger | 32 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 40 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 69.6 points |
In Mondeo Ford Mondeo horsepower was between 125 and 220 hp or 92 and 162 kW.
Ford Mondeo horsepower to weight ratio in Mondeo is shown in the chart.
Ford Mondeo horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 i 16V |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
+22% | 25 hp / 18 kw | 31 hp / 23 kw | 78.1 points |
2.2 TDCi |
175 hp / 129 kw
(+1%) |
+56% | 35 hp / 26 kw | 44 hp / 32 kw | 79.5 points |
2.0 TDCi |
130 hp / 96 kw
(-25%) |
+59% | 26 hp / 19 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 65 points |
2.0 i 16V |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
+24% | 29 hp / 21 kw | 36 hp / 27 kw | 72.5 points |
2.3 i 16V |
160 hp / 118 kw
(-8%) |
+23% | 32 hp / 24 kw | 40 hp / 30 kw | 69.6 points |
2.5 i 20V |
220 hp / 162 kw
(+27%) |
+31% | 44 hp / 32 kw | 44 hp / 32 kw | 88 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
Power to torque ratio | 22 % |
Power per passenger | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 31 hp / 23 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 78.1 points |
Vehicle | 2.2 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
175 hp / 129 kw
(+1%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 44 hp / 32 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 79.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
130 hp / 96 kw
(-25%) |
Power to torque ratio | 59 % |
Power per passenger | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 65 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 72.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.3 i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
160 hp / 118 kw
(-8%) |
Power to torque ratio | 23 % |
Power per passenger | 32 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 40 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 69.6 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 i 20V |
Power (difference from average) |
220 hp / 162 kw
(+27%) |
Power to torque ratio | 31 % |
Power per passenger | 44 hp / 32 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 44 hp / 32 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 88 points |
In Mondeo Ford Mondeo horsepower was between 125 and 220 hp or 92 and 162 kW.
Ford Mondeo horsepower to weight ratio in Mondeo is shown in the chart.
Ford Mondeo horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.3 i 16V |
160 hp / 118 kw
(-8%) |
+23% | 32 hp / 24 kw | 40 hp / 30 kw | 69.6 points |
2.0 i 16V |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
+24% | 29 hp / 21 kw | 36 hp / 27 kw | 72.5 points |
2.5 i 20V |
220 hp / 162 kw
(+27%) |
+31% | 44 hp / 32 kw | 44 hp / 32 kw | 88 points |
1.6 i 16V |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
+22% | 25 hp / 18 kw | 31 hp / 23 kw | 78.1 points |
2.0 TDCi |
130 hp / 96 kw
(-25%) |
+59% | 26 hp / 19 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 65 points |
1.8 TDCi |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
+63% | 25 hp / 18 kw | 31 hp / 23 kw | 69.4 points |
2.2 TDCi |
175 hp / 129 kw
(+1%) |
+56% | 35 hp / 26 kw | 44 hp / 32 kw | 79.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.3 i 16V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
160 hp / 118 kw
(-8%) |
Power to torque ratio | 23 % |
Power per passenger | 32 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 40 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 69.6 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 72.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 i 20V |
Power (difference from average) |
220 hp / 162 kw
(+27%) |
Power to torque ratio | 31 % |
Power per passenger | 44 hp / 32 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 44 hp / 32 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 88 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
Power to torque ratio | 22 % |
Power per passenger | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 31 hp / 23 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 78.1 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
130 hp / 96 kw
(-25%) |
Power to torque ratio | 59 % |
Power per passenger | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 65 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
Power to torque ratio | 63 % |
Power per passenger | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 31 hp / 23 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 69.4 points |
Vehicle | 2.2 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
175 hp / 129 kw
(+1%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 44 hp / 32 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 79.5 points |
In Mondeo Ford Mondeo horsepower was between 115 and 226 hp or 85 and 166 kW.
Ford Mondeo horsepower to weight ratio in Mondeo is shown in the chart.
Ford Mondeo horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
+23% | 34 hp / 25 kw | 28 hp / 21 kw | 68 points |
2.0 |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
+24% | 29 hp / 21 kw | 36 hp / 27 kw | 72.5 points |
1.8 |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
+26% | 25 hp / 18 kw | 31 hp / 23 kw | 69.4 points |
3.0 i V6 24V |
204 hp / 150 kw
(+18%) |
+27% | 41 hp / 30 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 68 points |
2.0 DI |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+59% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 57.5 points |
2.0 TDCi |
130 hp / 96 kw
(-25%) |
+61% | 26 hp / 19 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 65 points |
3.0 V6 24V ST220 |
226 hp / 166 kw
(+31%) |
+16% | 45 hp / 33 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 75.3 points |
2.2 TDCi |
155 hp / 114 kw
(-10%) |
+57% | 31 hp / 23 kw | 39 hp / 29 kw | 70.5 points |
1.8 i 16V Duratec SCi |
130 hp / 96 kw
(-25%) |
+26% | 26 hp / 19 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 72.2 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
Power to torque ratio | 23 % |
Power per passenger | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Power (difference from average) |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 72.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Power (difference from average) |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 31 hp / 23 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 69.4 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 i V6 24V |
Power (difference from average) |
204 hp / 150 kw
(+18%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 DI |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 59 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 57.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
130 hp / 96 kw
(-25%) |
Power to torque ratio | 61 % |
Power per passenger | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 65 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 24V ST220 |
Power (difference from average) |
226 hp / 166 kw
(+31%) |
Power to torque ratio | 16 % |
Power per passenger | 45 hp / 33 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75.3 points |
Vehicle | 2.2 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
155 hp / 114 kw
(-10%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 31 hp / 23 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 39 hp / 29 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V Duratec SCi |
Power (difference from average) |
130 hp / 96 kw
(-25%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 72.2 points |
In Mondeo Ford Mondeo horsepower was between 115 and 204 hp or 85 and 150 kW.
Ford Mondeo horsepower to weight ratio in Mondeo is shown in the chart.
Ford Mondeo horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 TDCi |
130 hp / 96 kw
(-25%) |
+61% | 26 hp / 19 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 65 points |
2.0 DI |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+59% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 57.5 points |
2.5 V6 |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
+23% | 34 hp / 25 kw | 28 hp / 21 kw | 68 points |
2.0 16V |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
+24% | 29 hp / 21 kw | 36 hp / 27 kw | 72.5 points |
1.8 16V |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
+26% | 25 hp / 18 kw | 31 hp / 23 kw | 69.4 points |
3.0 i V6 24V |
204 hp / 150 kw
(+18%) |
+27% | 41 hp / 30 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 68 points |
2.2 TDCi |
155 hp / 114 kw
(-10%) |
+57% | 31 hp / 23 kw | 39 hp / 29 kw | 70.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDCi |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
130 hp / 96 kw
(-25%) |
Power to torque ratio | 61 % |
Power per passenger | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 65 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 DI |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 59 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 57.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
Power to torque ratio | 23 % |
Power per passenger | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 72.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 31 hp / 23 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 69.4 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 i V6 24V |
Power (difference from average) |
204 hp / 150 kw
(+18%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68 points |
Vehicle | 2.2 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
155 hp / 114 kw
(-10%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 31 hp / 23 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 39 hp / 29 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70.5 points |
In Mondeo Ford Mondeo horsepower was between 115 and 226 hp or 85 and 166 kW.
Ford Mondeo horsepower to weight ratio in Mondeo is shown in the chart.
Ford Mondeo horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 16V |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
+26% | 25 hp / 18 kw | 31 hp / 23 kw | 69.4 points |
2.0 DI |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+59% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 57.5 points |
2.0 TDCi |
130 hp / 96 kw
(-25%) |
+61% | 26 hp / 19 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 65 points |
2.0 16V |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
+24% | 29 hp / 21 kw | 36 hp / 27 kw | 72.5 points |
3.0 i V6 24V |
204 hp / 150 kw
(+18%) |
+27% | 41 hp / 30 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 68 points |
2.5 V6 |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
+23% | 34 hp / 25 kw | 28 hp / 21 kw | 68 points |
3.0 V6 24V ST220 |
226 hp / 166 kw
(+31%) |
+16% | 45 hp / 33 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 75.3 points |
2.2 TDCi |
155 hp / 114 kw
(-10%) |
+57% | 31 hp / 23 kw | 39 hp / 29 kw | 70.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 31 hp / 23 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 69.4 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 DI |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 59 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 57.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
130 hp / 96 kw
(-25%) |
Power to torque ratio | 61 % |
Power per passenger | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 65 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 72.5 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 i V6 24V |
Power (difference from average) |
204 hp / 150 kw
(+18%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
Power to torque ratio | 23 % |
Power per passenger | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 24V ST220 |
Power (difference from average) |
226 hp / 166 kw
(+31%) |
Power to torque ratio | 16 % |
Power per passenger | 45 hp / 33 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75.3 points |
Vehicle | 2.2 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
155 hp / 114 kw
(-10%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 31 hp / 23 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 39 hp / 29 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70.5 points |
In Mondeo Ford Mondeo horsepower was between 90 and 205 hp or 66 and 151 kW.
Ford Mondeo horsepower to weight ratio in Mondeo is shown in the chart.
Ford Mondeo horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 TD |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
+50% | 18 hp / 13 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 50 points |
2.0i |
130 hp / 96 kw
(-25%) |
+26% | 26 hp / 19 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 65 points |
1.6i 16V |
95 hp / 70 kw
(-45%) |
+33% | 19 hp / 14 kw | 24 hp / 18 kw | 59.4 points |
2.5 ST 200 |
205 hp / 151 kw
(+18%) |
+12% | 41 hp / 30 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 82 points |
1.8i 16V |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+28% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 63.9 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 TD |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | 50 % |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 50 points |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Power (difference from average) |
130 hp / 96 kw
(-25%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 65 points |
Vehicle | 1.6i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
95 hp / 70 kw
(-45%) |
Power to torque ratio | 33 % |
Power per passenger | 19 hp / 14 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 59.4 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 ST 200 |
Power (difference from average) |
205 hp / 151 kw
(+18%) |
Power to torque ratio | 12 % |
Power per passenger | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 82 points |
Vehicle | 1.8i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 63.9 points |
In Mondeo Ford Mondeo horsepower was between 90 and 205 hp or 66 and 151 kW.
Ford Mondeo horsepower to weight ratio in Mondeo is shown in the chart.
Ford Mondeo horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 TD |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
+50% | 18 hp / 13 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 50 points |
2.5 ST 200 |
205 hp / 151 kw
(+18%) |
+12% | 41 hp / 30 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 82 points |
2.5i V6 |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
+23% | 34 hp / 25 kw | 28 hp / 21 kw | 68 points |
2.0i |
130 hp / 96 kw
(-25%) |
+27% | 26 hp / 19 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 65 points |
1.8 16V |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+28% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 63.9 points |
1.6 i 16V |
95 hp / 70 kw
(-45%) |
+33% | 19 hp / 14 kw | 24 hp / 18 kw | 59.4 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 TD |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | 50 % |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 50 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 ST 200 |
Power (difference from average) |
205 hp / 151 kw
(+18%) |
Power to torque ratio | 12 % |
Power per passenger | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 82 points |
Vehicle | 2.5i V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
Power to torque ratio | 23 % |
Power per passenger | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68 points |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Power (difference from average) |
130 hp / 96 kw
(-25%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 65 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 63.9 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
95 hp / 70 kw
(-45%) |
Power to torque ratio | 33 % |
Power per passenger | 19 hp / 14 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 59.4 points |
In Mondeo Ford Mondeo horsepower was between 90 and 205 hp or 66 and 151 kW.
Ford Mondeo horsepower to weight ratio in Mondeo is shown in the chart.
Ford Mondeo horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i |
130 hp / 96 kw
(-25%) |
+26% | 26 hp / 19 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 65 points |
2.5 ST 200 |
205 hp / 151 kw
(+18%) |
+12% | 41 hp / 30 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 82 points |
1.8i 16V |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+28% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 63.9 points |
1.6 16V |
95 hp / 70 kw
(-45%) |
+33% | 19 hp / 14 kw | 24 hp / 18 kw | 59.4 points |
1.8 TD |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
+50% | 18 hp / 13 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 50 points |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
130 hp / 96 kw
(-25%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 65 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 ST 200 |
Power (difference from average) |
205 hp / 151 kw
(+18%) |
Power to torque ratio | 12 % |
Power per passenger | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 82 points |
Vehicle | 1.8i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 63.9 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
95 hp / 70 kw
(-45%) |
Power to torque ratio | 33 % |
Power per passenger | 19 hp / 14 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 59.4 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 TD |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | 50 % |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 50 points |
In Mondeo Ford Mondeo horsepower was between 88 and 170 hp or 65 and 125 kW.
Ford Mondeo horsepower to weight ratio in Mondeo is shown in the chart.
Ford Mondeo horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5i 24V |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
+23% | 34 hp / 25 kw | 28 hp / 21 kw | 68 points |
1.6 i 16V |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
+33% | 18 hp / 13 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 56.3 points |
1.8 i 16V |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+27% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 63.9 points |
2.0 i 16V |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
+24% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 68 points |
1.8 TD |
88 hp / 65 kw
(-49%) |
+51% | 18 hp / 13 kw | 22 hp / 16 kw | 48.9 points |
2.0i 4X4 |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
+24% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 68 points |
Vehicle | 2.5i 24V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
Power to torque ratio | 23 % |
Power per passenger | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | 33 % |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 56.3 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 63.9 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 TD |
Power (difference from average) |
88 hp / 65 kw
(-49%) |
Power to torque ratio | 51 % |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 48.9 points |
Vehicle | 2.0i 4X4 |
Power (difference from average) |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68 points |
In Mondeo Ford Mondeo horsepower was between 88 and 170 hp or 65 and 125 kW.
Ford Mondeo horsepower to weight ratio in Mondeo is shown in the chart.
Ford Mondeo horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i 16V |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
+24% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 68 points |
1.6 i 16V |
88 hp / 65 kw
(-49%) |
+35% | 18 hp / 13 kw | 22 hp / 16 kw | 55 points |
2.5i 24V |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
+23% | 34 hp / 25 kw | 28 hp / 21 kw | 68 points |
1.8i 16V |
112 hp / 82 kw
(-35%) |
+29% | 22 hp / 16 kw | 28 hp / 21 kw | 62.2 points |
2.0 i 16V 4x4 |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
+24% | 34 hp / 25 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 68 points |
1.8 TD |
88 hp / 65 kw
(-49%) |
+51% | 18 hp / 13 kw | 22 hp / 16 kw | 48.9 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
88 hp / 65 kw
(-49%) |
Power to torque ratio | 35 % |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 55 points |
Vehicle | 2.5i 24V |
Power (difference from average) |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
Power to torque ratio | 23 % |
Power per passenger | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68 points |
Vehicle | 1.8i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
112 hp / 82 kw
(-35%) |
Power to torque ratio | 29 % |
Power per passenger | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 62.2 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V 4x4 |
Power (difference from average) |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 TD |
Power (difference from average) |
88 hp / 65 kw
(-49%) |
Power to torque ratio | 51 % |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 48.9 points |
In Mondeo Ford Mondeo horsepower was between 88 and 170 hp or 65 and 125 kW.
Ford Mondeo horsepower to weight ratio in Mondeo is shown in the chart.
Ford Mondeo horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8i 16V |
112 hp / 82 kw
(-35%) |
+29% | 22 hp / 16 kw | 28 hp / 21 kw | 62.2 points |
2.0 i 16V 4x4 |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
+24% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 68 points |
2.0 i 16V |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
+30% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 68 points |
1.6 i 16V |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
+33% | 18 hp / 13 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 56.3 points |
1.8 i 16V |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+27% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 63.9 points |
2.5i 24V |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
+23% | 34 hp / 25 kw | 28 hp / 21 kw | 68 points |
1.8 TD |
88 hp / 65 kw
(-49%) |
+51% | 18 hp / 13 kw | 22 hp / 16 kw | 48.9 points |
Vehicle | 1.8i 16V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
112 hp / 82 kw
(-35%) |
Power to torque ratio | 29 % |
Power per passenger | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 62.2 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V 4x4 |
Power (difference from average) |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | 33 % |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 56.3 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 63.9 points |
Vehicle | 2.5i 24V |
Power (difference from average) |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
Power to torque ratio | 23 % |
Power per passenger | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 TD |
Power (difference from average) |
88 hp / 65 kw
(-49%) |
Power to torque ratio | 51 % |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 48.9 points |