In 2018 Ford Fusion horsepower was between 141 and 325 hp or 104 and 239 kW.
Ford Fusion horsepower to weight ratio in 2018 is shown in the chart.
Ford Fusion horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 Duratec |
175 hp / 129 kw
(+1%) |
+26% | 35 hp / 26 kw | 44 hp / 32 kw | 70 points |
1.5 EcoBoost |
181 hp / 133 kw
(+5%) |
+28% | 36 hp / 27 kw | 45 hp / 33 kw | 120.7 points |
2.0 EcoBoost |
240 hp / 177 kw
(+39%) |
+36% | 48 hp / 35 kw | 60 hp / 44 kw | 120 points |
2.0 |
141 hp / 104 kw
(-18%) |
+19% | 28 hp / 21 kw | 35 hp / 26 kw | 70.5 points |
2.7 EcoBoost V6 |
325 hp / 239 kw
(+88%) |
+37% | 65 hp / 48 kw | 54 hp / 40 kw | 120.4 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 Duratec |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
175 hp / 129 kw
(+1%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 44 hp / 32 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70 points |
Vehicle | 1.5 EcoBoost |
Power (difference from average) |
181 hp / 133 kw
(+5%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 45 hp / 33 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 120.7 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBoost |
Power (difference from average) |
240 hp / 177 kw
(+39%) |
Power to torque ratio | 36 % |
Power per passenger | 48 hp / 35 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 60 hp / 44 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 120 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Power (difference from average) |
141 hp / 104 kw
(-18%) |
Power to torque ratio | 19 % |
Power per passenger | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.7 EcoBoost V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
325 hp / 239 kw
(+88%) |
Power to torque ratio | 37 % |
Power per passenger | 65 hp / 48 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 54 hp / 40 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 120.4 points |
In 2016 Ford Fusion horsepower was between 141 and 325 hp or 104 and 239 kW.
Ford Fusion horsepower to weight ratio in 2016 is shown in the chart.
Ford Fusion horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
141 hp / 104 kw
(-18%) |
+19% | 28 hp / 21 kw | 35 hp / 26 kw | 70.5 points |
1.5 EcoBoost |
181 hp / 133 kw
(+5%) |
+28% | 36 hp / 27 kw | 45 hp / 33 kw | 120.7 points |
2.5 |
175 hp / 129 kw
(+1%) |
+26% | 35 hp / 26 kw | 44 hp / 32 kw | 70 points |
2.0 EcoBoost |
245 hp / 180 kw
(+42%) |
+34% | 49 hp / 36 kw | 61 hp / 45 kw | 122.5 points |
2.7 EcoBoost V6 |
325 hp / 239 kw
(+88%) |
+37% | 65 hp / 48 kw | 54 hp / 40 kw | 120.4 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
141 hp / 104 kw
(-18%) |
Power to torque ratio | 19 % |
Power per passenger | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.5 EcoBoost |
Power (difference from average) |
181 hp / 133 kw
(+5%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 45 hp / 33 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 120.7 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 |
Power (difference from average) |
175 hp / 129 kw
(+1%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 44 hp / 32 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBoost |
Power (difference from average) |
245 hp / 180 kw
(+42%) |
Power to torque ratio | 34 % |
Power per passenger | 49 hp / 36 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 61 hp / 45 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 122.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.7 EcoBoost V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
325 hp / 239 kw
(+88%) |
Power to torque ratio | 37 % |
Power per passenger | 65 hp / 48 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 54 hp / 40 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 120.4 points |
In 2013 Ford Fusion horsepower was 141 hp or 104 kW
Ford Fusion horsepower to weight ratio in 2013 is shown in the chart.
Ford Fusion horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
141 hp / 104 kw
(-18%) |
+19% | 28 hp / 21 kw | 35 hp / 26 kw | 70.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
141 hp / 104 kw
(-18%) |
Power to torque ratio | 19 % |
Power per passenger | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70.5 points |
In 2006 Ford Fusion horsepower was between 162 and 212 hp or 119 and 156 kW.
Ford Fusion horsepower to weight ratio in 2006 is shown in the chart.
Ford Fusion horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.3 i 16V |
162 hp / 119 kw
(-6%) |
+20% | 32 hp / 24 kw | 41 hp / 30 kw | 70.4 points |
3.0 i V6 24V |
212 hp / 156 kw
(+23%) |
+22% | 42 hp / 31 kw | 35 hp / 26 kw | 70.7 points |
Vehicle | 2.3 i 16V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
162 hp / 119 kw
(-6%) |
Power to torque ratio | 20 % |
Power per passenger | 32 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70.4 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 i V6 24V |
Power (difference from average) |
212 hp / 156 kw
(+23%) |
Power to torque ratio | 22 % |
Power per passenger | 42 hp / 31 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70.7 points |
In 2005 Ford Fusion horsepower was between 68 and 101 hp or 50 and 74 kW.
Ford Fusion horsepower to weight ratio in 2005 is shown in the chart.
Ford Fusion horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.4 TDCi |
68 hp / 50 kw
(-61%) |
+58% | 14 hp / 10 kw | 17 hp / 13 kw | 48.6 points |
1.6 |
101 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
+31% | 20 hp / 15 kw | 25 hp / 19 kw | 63.1 points |
1.6 TDCi |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
+56% | 18 hp / 13 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 56.3 points |
1.2 |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
+32% | 15 hp / 11 kw | 19 hp / 14 kw | 62.5 points |
1.4 |
80 hp / 59 kw
(-54%) |
+35% | 16 hp / 12 kw | 20 hp / 15 kw | 57.1 points |
Vehicle | 1.4 TDCi |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
68 hp / 50 kw
(-61%) |
Power to torque ratio | 58 % |
Power per passenger | 14 hp / 10 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 17 hp / 13 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 48.6 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Power (difference from average) |
101 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
Power to torque ratio | 31 % |
Power per passenger | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 25 hp / 19 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 63.1 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 56.3 points |
Vehicle | 1.2 |
Power (difference from average) |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 15 hp / 11 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 19 hp / 14 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 62.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.4 |
Power (difference from average) |
80 hp / 59 kw
(-54%) |
Power to torque ratio | 35 % |
Power per passenger | 16 hp / 12 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 57.1 points |
In 2002 Ford Fusion horsepower was between 68 and 100 hp or 50 and 74 kW.
Ford Fusion horsepower to weight ratio in 2002 is shown in the chart.
Ford Fusion horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.4 Duratec |
80 hp / 59 kw
(-54%) |
+37% | 16 hp / 12 kw | 20 hp / 15 kw | 57.1 points |
1.2 |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
+32% | 15 hp / 11 kw | 19 hp / 14 kw | 62.5 points |
1.6 Duratec |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
+30% | 20 hp / 15 kw | 25 hp / 19 kw | 62.5 points |
1.4 TDCi |
68 hp / 50 kw
(-61%) |
+58% | 14 hp / 10 kw | 17 hp / 13 kw | 48.6 points |
1.6 TDCi |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
+56% | 18 hp / 13 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 56.3 points |
Vehicle | 1.4 Duratec |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
80 hp / 59 kw
(-54%) |
Power to torque ratio | 37 % |
Power per passenger | 16 hp / 12 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 57.1 points |
Vehicle | 1.2 |
Power (difference from average) |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 15 hp / 11 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 19 hp / 14 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 62.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 Duratec |
Power (difference from average) |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 25 hp / 19 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 62.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.4 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
68 hp / 50 kw
(-61%) |
Power to torque ratio | 58 % |
Power per passenger | 14 hp / 10 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 17 hp / 13 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 48.6 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 56.3 points |