2019 Focus IV Active Wagon
2019 Focus IV Active Hatchback
2019 Focus IV Hatchback
2019 Focus IV Wagon
2014 Focus III Hatchback (facelift 2014)
2014 Focus III Sedan (facelift 2014)
2014 Focus III Wagon (facelift 2014)
2013 Focus III Hatchback
2013 Focus III Sedan
2013 Focus III Wagon
Focus II Hatchback
Focus Cabriolet II
Focus II Sedan
Focus Turnier II
Focus Hatchback I
Focus Turnier I
2000 Focus Hatchback (USA)
2000 Focus Turnier (USA)
2000 Focus Sedan (USA)
Focus I Sedan
In 2019 Ford Focus horsepower was between 120 and 182 hp or 88 and 134 kW.
Ford Focus horsepower to weight ratio in 2019 is shown in the chart.
Ford Focus horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 EcoBlue |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+59% | 30 hp / 22 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | - |
1.5 EcoBlue |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
+60% | 24 hp / 18 kw | 30 hp / 22 kw | - |
1.5 EcoBoost |
182 hp / 134 kw
(+5%) |
+24% | 36 hp / 27 kw | 61 hp / 45 kw | 121.3 points |
1.0 EcoBoost |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
+26% | 25 hp / 18 kw | 42 hp / 31 kw | 125 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBlue |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 59 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.5 EcoBlue |
Power (difference from average) |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
Power to torque ratio | 60 % |
Power per passenger | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.5 EcoBoost |
Power (difference from average) |
182 hp / 134 kw
(+5%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 61 hp / 45 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 121.3 points |
Vehicle | 1.0 EcoBoost |
Power (difference from average) |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 42 hp / 31 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 125 points |
In 2019 Ford Focus horsepower was between 120 and 182 hp or 88 and 134 kW.
Ford Focus horsepower to weight ratio in 2019 is shown in the chart.
Ford Focus horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 EcoBlue |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+59% | 30 hp / 22 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | - |
1.5 EcoBlue |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
+60% | 24 hp / 18 kw | 30 hp / 22 kw | - |
1.5 EcoBoost |
182 hp / 134 kw
(+5%) |
+24% | 36 hp / 27 kw | 61 hp / 45 kw | 121.3 points |
1.0 EcoBoost |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
+26% | 25 hp / 18 kw | 42 hp / 31 kw | 125 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBlue |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 59 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.5 EcoBlue |
Power (difference from average) |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
Power to torque ratio | 60 % |
Power per passenger | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.5 EcoBoost |
Power (difference from average) |
182 hp / 134 kw
(+5%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 61 hp / 45 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 121.3 points |
Vehicle | 1.0 EcoBoost |
Power (difference from average) |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 42 hp / 31 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 125 points |
In 2019 Ford Focus horsepower was between 120 and 280 hp or 88 and 206 kW.
Ford Focus horsepower to weight ratio in 2019 is shown in the chart.
Ford Focus horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.0 EcoBoost |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
+26% | 25 hp / 18 kw | 42 hp / 31 kw | 125 points |
1.5 EcoBoost |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+38% | 30 hp / 22 kw | 50 hp / 37 kw | 100 points |
1.5 EcoBlue |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
+60% | 24 hp / 18 kw | 30 hp / 22 kw | 80 points |
2.0 EcoBlue |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+59% | 30 hp / 22 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 75 points |
ST 2.3 EcoBoost |
280 hp / 206 kw
(+62%) |
+33% | 56 hp / 41 kw | 70 hp / 52 kw | - |
ST 2.0 EcoBlue |
190 hp / 140 kw
(+10%) |
+53% | 38 hp / 28 kw | 48 hp / 35 kw | - |
Vehicle | 1.0 EcoBoost |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 42 hp / 31 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 125 points |
Vehicle | 1.5 EcoBoost |
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 38 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 50 hp / 37 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 100 points |
Vehicle | 1.5 EcoBlue |
Power (difference from average) |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
Power to torque ratio | 60 % |
Power per passenger | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 80 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBlue |
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 59 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75 points |
Vehicle | ST 2.3 EcoBoost |
Power (difference from average) |
280 hp / 206 kw
(+62%) |
Power to torque ratio | 33 % |
Power per passenger | 56 hp / 41 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 70 hp / 52 kw |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | ST 2.0 EcoBlue |
Power (difference from average) |
190 hp / 140 kw
(+10%) |
Power to torque ratio | 53 % |
Power per passenger | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 48 hp / 35 kw |
Power to consumption rate | - |
In 2019 Ford Focus horsepower was between 120 and 280 hp or 88 and 206 kW.
Ford Focus horsepower to weight ratio in 2019 is shown in the chart.
Ford Focus horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.0 EcoBoost |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
+26% | 25 hp / 18 kw | 42 hp / 31 kw | 125 points |
1.5 EcoBoost |
182 hp / 134 kw
(+5%) |
+24% | 36 hp / 27 kw | 61 hp / 45 kw | 121.3 points |
2.0 EcoBlue |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+59% | 30 hp / 22 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 75 points |
1.5 EcoBlue |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
+60% | 24 hp / 18 kw | 30 hp / 22 kw | 80 points |
ST 2.3 EcoBoost |
280 hp / 206 kw
(+62%) |
+33% | 56 hp / 41 kw | 70 hp / 52 kw | - |
ST 2.0 EcoBlue |
190 hp / 140 kw
(+10%) |
+53% | 38 hp / 28 kw | 48 hp / 35 kw | - |
Vehicle | 1.0 EcoBoost |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 42 hp / 31 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 125 points |
Vehicle | 1.5 EcoBoost |
Power (difference from average) |
182 hp / 134 kw
(+5%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 61 hp / 45 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 121.3 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBlue |
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 59 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75 points |
Vehicle | 1.5 EcoBlue |
Power (difference from average) |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
Power to torque ratio | 60 % |
Power per passenger | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 80 points |
Vehicle | ST 2.3 EcoBoost |
Power (difference from average) |
280 hp / 206 kw
(+62%) |
Power to torque ratio | 33 % |
Power per passenger | 56 hp / 41 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 70 hp / 52 kw |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | ST 2.0 EcoBlue |
Power (difference from average) |
190 hp / 140 kw
(+10%) |
Power to torque ratio | 53 % |
Power per passenger | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 48 hp / 35 kw |
Power to consumption rate | - |
In 2014 Ford Focus horsepower was between 85 and 350 hp or 63 and 257 kW.
Ford Focus horsepower to weight ratio in 2014 is shown in the chart.
Ford Focus horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5 EcoBoost |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+38% | 30 hp / 22 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 100 points |
1.6 TDCi |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+57% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 71.9 points |
ST 2.0 EcoBoost |
250 hp / 184 kw
(+45%) |
+31% | 50 hp / 37 kw | 63 hp / 46 kw | 125 points |
ST 2.0 TDCi |
185 hp / 136 kw
(+7%) |
+54% | 37 hp / 27 kw | 46 hp / 34 kw | 92.5 points |
1.6 Ti-VCT |
85 hp / 63 kw
(-51%) |
+40% | 17 hp / 13 kw | 21 hp / 16 kw | 53.1 points |
2.0 TDCi |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+59% | 30 hp / 22 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 75 points |
1.0 EcoBoost |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
+26% | 25 hp / 18 kw | 42 hp / 31 kw | 125 points |
1.5 TDCi |
95 hp / 70 kw
(-45%) |
+65% | 19 hp / 14 kw | 24 hp / 18 kw | 63.3 points |
RS 2.3 EcoBoost |
350 hp / 257 kw
(+102%) |
+20% | 70 hp / 51 kw | 88 hp / 64 kw | 152.2 points |
33.5 kWh |
146 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
+41% | 29 hp / 21 kw | - | - |
Vehicle | 1.5 EcoBoost |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 38 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 100 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 71.9 points |
Vehicle | ST 2.0 EcoBoost |
Power (difference from average) |
250 hp / 184 kw
(+45%) |
Power to torque ratio | 31 % |
Power per passenger | 50 hp / 37 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 63 hp / 46 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 125 points |
Vehicle | ST 2.0 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
185 hp / 136 kw
(+7%) |
Power to torque ratio | 54 % |
Power per passenger | 37 hp / 27 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 46 hp / 34 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 92.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 Ti-VCT |
Power (difference from average) |
85 hp / 63 kw
(-51%) |
Power to torque ratio | 40 % |
Power per passenger | 17 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 21 hp / 16 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 53.1 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 59 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75 points |
Vehicle | 1.0 EcoBoost |
Power (difference from average) |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 42 hp / 31 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 125 points |
Vehicle | 1.5 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
95 hp / 70 kw
(-45%) |
Power to torque ratio | 65 % |
Power per passenger | 19 hp / 14 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 63.3 points |
Vehicle | RS 2.3 EcoBoost |
Power (difference from average) |
350 hp / 257 kw
(+102%) |
Power to torque ratio | 20 % |
Power per passenger | 70 hp / 51 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 88 hp / 64 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 152.2 points |
Vehicle | 33.5 kWh |
Power (difference from average) |
146 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 41 % |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
In 2014 Ford Focus horsepower was between 95 and 182 hp or 70 and 134 kW.
Ford Focus horsepower to weight ratio in 2014 is shown in the chart.
Ford Focus horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.0 EcoBoost |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
+26% | 25 hp / 18 kw | 42 hp / 31 kw | 125 points |
1.5 EcoBoost |
182 hp / 134 kw
(+5%) |
+24% | 36 hp / 27 kw | 46 hp / 34 kw | 121.3 points |
1.6 Ti-VCT |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
+21% | 25 hp / 18 kw | 31 hp / 23 kw | 78.1 points |
1.5 TDCi |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
+56% | 24 hp / 18 kw | 30 hp / 22 kw | 80 points |
1.6 TDCi |
95 hp / 70 kw
(-45%) |
+56% | 19 hp / 14 kw | 24 hp / 18 kw | 59.4 points |
2.0 TDCi |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+59% | 30 hp / 22 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 75 points |
Vehicle | 1.0 EcoBoost |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 42 hp / 31 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 125 points |
Vehicle | 1.5 EcoBoost |
Power (difference from average) |
182 hp / 134 kw
(+5%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 46 hp / 34 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 121.3 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 Ti-VCT |
Power (difference from average) |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
Power to torque ratio | 21 % |
Power per passenger | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 31 hp / 23 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 78.1 points |
Vehicle | 1.5 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 80 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
95 hp / 70 kw
(-45%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 19 hp / 14 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 59.4 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 59 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75 points |
In 2014 Ford Focus horsepower was between 95 and 250 hp or 70 and 184 kW.
Ford Focus horsepower to weight ratio in 2014 is shown in the chart.
Ford Focus horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5 EcoBoost |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+38% | 30 hp / 22 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 100 points |
1.6 TDCi |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+57% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 71.9 points |
1.5 TDCi |
95 hp / 70 kw
(-45%) |
+65% | 19 hp / 14 kw | 24 hp / 18 kw | 63.3 points |
1.6 Ti-VCT |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
+21% | 25 hp / 18 kw | 31 hp / 23 kw | 78.1 points |
1.0 EcoBoost |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
+26% | 25 hp / 18 kw | 42 hp / 31 kw | 125 points |
2.0 TDCi |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+59% | 30 hp / 22 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 75 points |
ST 2.0 TDCi |
185 hp / 136 kw
(+7%) |
+54% | 37 hp / 27 kw | 46 hp / 34 kw | 92.5 points |
ST 2.0 EcoBoost |
250 hp / 184 kw
(+45%) |
+31% | 50 hp / 37 kw | 63 hp / 46 kw | 125 points |
Vehicle | 1.5 EcoBoost |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 38 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 100 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 71.9 points |
Vehicle | 1.5 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
95 hp / 70 kw
(-45%) |
Power to torque ratio | 65 % |
Power per passenger | 19 hp / 14 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 63.3 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 Ti-VCT |
Power (difference from average) |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
Power to torque ratio | 21 % |
Power per passenger | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 31 hp / 23 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 78.1 points |
Vehicle | 1.0 EcoBoost |
Power (difference from average) |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 42 hp / 31 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 125 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 59 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75 points |
Vehicle | ST 2.0 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
185 hp / 136 kw
(+7%) |
Power to torque ratio | 54 % |
Power per passenger | 37 hp / 27 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 46 hp / 34 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 92.5 points |
Vehicle | ST 2.0 EcoBoost |
Power (difference from average) |
250 hp / 184 kw
(+45%) |
Power to torque ratio | 31 % |
Power per passenger | 50 hp / 37 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 63 hp / 46 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 125 points |
In 2013 Ford Focus horsepower was between 115 and 250 hp or 85 and 184 kW.
Ford Focus horsepower to weight ratio in 2013 is shown in the chart.
Ford Focus horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.0 EcoBoost |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
- | 25 hp / 18 kw | - | - |
1.6 Ti-VCT |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
- | 25 hp / 18 kw | - | - |
1.6 EcoBoost |
182 hp / 134 kw
(+5%) |
- | 36 hp / 27 kw | - | - |
1.6 TDCi |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
- | 23 hp / 17 kw | - | - |
2.0 TDCi |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
- | 33 hp / 24 kw | - | - |
ST 2.0 EcoBoost |
250 hp / 184 kw
(+45%) |
+31% | 50 hp / 37 kw | 63 hp / 46 kw | 125 points |
Vehicle | 1.0 EcoBoost |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.6 Ti-VCT |
Power (difference from average) |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.6 EcoBoost |
Power (difference from average) |
182 hp / 134 kw
(+5%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.6 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | ST 2.0 EcoBoost |
Power (difference from average) |
250 hp / 184 kw
(+45%) |
Power to torque ratio | 31 % |
Power per passenger | 50 hp / 37 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 63 hp / 46 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 125 points |
In 2013 Ford Focus horsepower was between 115 and 182 hp or 85 and 134 kW.
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.0 EcoBoost |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
+26% | 25 hp / 18 kw | 42 hp / 31 kw | - |
1.6 Ti-VCT |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
- | 25 hp / 18 kw | - | - |
1.6 EcoBoost |
182 hp / 134 kw
(+5%) |
- | 36 hp / 27 kw | - | - |
1.6 TDCi |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
- | 23 hp / 17 kw | - | - |
2.0 TDCi |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
- | 33 hp / 24 kw | - | - |
Vehicle | 1.0 EcoBoost |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 42 hp / 31 kw |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.6 Ti-VCT |
Power (difference from average) |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.6 EcoBoost |
Power (difference from average) |
182 hp / 134 kw
(+5%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.6 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
In 2013 Ford Focus horsepower was between 115 and 250 hp or 85 and 184 kW.
Ford Focus horsepower to weight ratio in 2013 is shown in the chart.
Ford Focus horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 Ti-VCT |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
+21% | 25 hp / 18 kw | 31 hp / 23 kw | 78.1 points |
1.6 EcoBoost |
182 hp / 134 kw
(+5%) |
+24% | 36 hp / 27 kw | 46 hp / 34 kw | 113.8 points |
2.0 TDCi |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
+52% | 33 hp / 24 kw | 41 hp / 30 kw | 81.5 points |
1.6 TDCi |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+57% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 71.9 points |
ST 2.0 EcoBoost |
250 hp / 184 kw
(+45%) |
+31% | 50 hp / 37 kw | 63 hp / 46 kw | 125 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 Ti-VCT |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
Power to torque ratio | 21 % |
Power per passenger | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 31 hp / 23 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 78.1 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 EcoBoost |
Power (difference from average) |
182 hp / 134 kw
(+5%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 46 hp / 34 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 113.8 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
Power to torque ratio | 52 % |
Power per passenger | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 81.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 71.9 points |
Vehicle | ST 2.0 EcoBoost |
Power (difference from average) |
250 hp / 184 kw
(+45%) |
Power to torque ratio | 31 % |
Power per passenger | 50 hp / 37 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 63 hp / 46 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 125 points |
In Focus Ford Focus horsepower was between 80 and 305 hp or 59 and 224 kW.
Ford Focus horsepower to weight ratio in Focus is shown in the chart.
Ford Focus horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.4 Duratec 16V |
80 hp / 59 kw
(-54%) |
+37% | 16 hp / 12 kw | 20 hp / 15 kw | 57.1 points |
1.6 Duratec 16V |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
+30% | 20 hp / 15 kw | 25 hp / 19 kw | 62.5 points |
1.8 TDCi |
116 hp / 85 kw
(-33%) |
+54% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 64.4 points |
1.6 Duratec Ti-VCR 16V |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+26% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 71.9 points |
2.0 Duratec 16V |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
+22% | 29 hp / 21 kw | 36 hp / 27 kw | 72.5 points |
1.6 TDCi |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
+58% | 18 hp / 13 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 56.3 points |
1.6 TDCi HP |
109 hp / 80 kw
(-37%) |
+55% | 22 hp / 16 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 68.1 points |
1.8 i 16V |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
+24% | 25 hp / 18 kw | 31 hp / 23 kw | 69.4 points |
2.0 16V |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
+22% | 29 hp / 21 kw | 36 hp / 27 kw | 72.5 points |
2.0 TDCi |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
+58% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 68 points |
ST 2.5 i 20V |
225 hp / 165 kw
(+30%) |
+30% | 45 hp / 33 kw | 45 hp / 33 kw | 90 points |
RS 2.5 |
305 hp / 224 kw
(+76%) |
+31% | 76 hp / 56 kw | 61 hp / 45 kw | 122 points |
Vehicle | 1.4 Duratec 16V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
80 hp / 59 kw
(-54%) |
Power to torque ratio | 37 % |
Power per passenger | 16 hp / 12 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 57.1 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 Duratec 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 25 hp / 19 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 62.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
116 hp / 85 kw
(-33%) |
Power to torque ratio | 54 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 64.4 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 Duratec Ti-VCR 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 71.9 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 Duratec 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 22 % |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 72.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | 58 % |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 56.3 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 TDCi HP |
Power (difference from average) |
109 hp / 80 kw
(-37%) |
Power to torque ratio | 55 % |
Power per passenger | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68.1 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 31 hp / 23 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 69.4 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 22 % |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 72.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 58 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68 points |
Vehicle | ST 2.5 i 20V |
Power (difference from average) |
225 hp / 165 kw
(+30%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 45 hp / 33 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 45 hp / 33 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 90 points |
Vehicle | RS 2.5 |
Power (difference from average) |
305 hp / 224 kw
(+76%) |
Power to torque ratio | 31 % |
Power per passenger | 76 hp / 56 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 61 hp / 45 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 122 points |
In Focus Ford Focus horsepower was between 100 and 145 hp or 74 and 107 kW.
Ford Focus horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 Duratec 16V |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
- | 25 hp / 19 kw | - | - |
2.0 Duratec 16V |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
+24% | 36 hp / 27 kw | 36 hp / 27 kw | 72.5 points |
2.0 TDCi |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
- | 34 hp / 25 kw | - | - |
Vehicle | 1.6 Duratec 16V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 25 hp / 19 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 Duratec 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 72.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
In Focus Ford Focus horsepower was between 80 and 145 hp or 59 and 107 kW.
Ford Focus horsepower to weight ratio in Focus is shown in the chart.
Ford Focus horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 Duratec 16V |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
+30% | 20 hp / 15 kw | 25 hp / 19 kw | 62.5 points |
1.4 Duratec 16V |
80 hp / 59 kw
(-54%) |
+37% | 16 hp / 12 kw | 20 hp / 15 kw | 57.1 points |
1.6 Duratec Ti-VCR 16V |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+26% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 71.9 points |
1.6 TDCi |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
+56% | 18 hp / 13 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 56.3 points |
1.8 TDCi |
116 hp / 85 kw
(-33%) |
+54% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 64.4 points |
1.6 TDCi HP |
109 hp / 80 kw
(-37%) |
+55% | 22 hp / 16 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 68.1 points |
1.8 i 16V |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
+24% | 25 hp / 18 kw | 31 hp / 23 kw | 69.4 points |
2.0 16V |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
+24% | 29 hp / 21 kw | 36 hp / 27 kw | 72.5 points |
2.0 Duratec 16V |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
+24% | 29 hp / 21 kw | 36 hp / 27 kw | 72.5 points |
2.0 TDCi |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
+58% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 68 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 Duratec 16V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 25 hp / 19 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 62.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.4 Duratec 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
80 hp / 59 kw
(-54%) |
Power to torque ratio | 37 % |
Power per passenger | 16 hp / 12 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 57.1 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 Duratec Ti-VCR 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 71.9 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 56.3 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
116 hp / 85 kw
(-33%) |
Power to torque ratio | 54 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 64.4 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 TDCi HP |
Power (difference from average) |
109 hp / 80 kw
(-37%) |
Power to torque ratio | 55 % |
Power per passenger | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68.1 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 31 hp / 23 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 69.4 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 72.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 Duratec 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 72.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 58 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68 points |
In Focus Ford Focus horsepower was between 80 and 145 hp or 59 and 107 kW.
Ford Focus horsepower to weight ratio in Focus is shown in the chart.
Ford Focus horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.4 Duratec 16V |
80 hp / 59 kw
(-54%) |
+37% | 16 hp / 12 kw | 20 hp / 15 kw | 57.1 points |
1.6 Duratec 16V |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
+30% | 20 hp / 15 kw | 25 hp / 19 kw | 62.5 points |
1.6 Duratec Ti-VCR 16V |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+26% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 71.9 points |
1.6 TDCi |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
+56% | 18 hp / 13 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 56.3 points |
1.6 TDCi HP |
109 hp / 80 kw
(-37%) |
+55% | 22 hp / 16 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 68.1 points |
1.8 i 16V |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
+24% | 25 hp / 18 kw | 31 hp / 23 kw | 69.4 points |
1.8 TDCi |
116 hp / 85 kw
(-33%) |
+54% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 64.4 points |
2.0 Duratec 16V |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
+22% | 29 hp / 21 kw | 36 hp / 27 kw | 72.5 points |
2.0 TDCi |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
+58% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 68 points |
Vehicle | 1.4 Duratec 16V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
80 hp / 59 kw
(-54%) |
Power to torque ratio | 37 % |
Power per passenger | 16 hp / 12 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 57.1 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 Duratec 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 25 hp / 19 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 62.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 Duratec Ti-VCR 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 71.9 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 56.3 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 TDCi HP |
Power (difference from average) |
109 hp / 80 kw
(-37%) |
Power to torque ratio | 55 % |
Power per passenger | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68.1 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 31 hp / 23 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 69.4 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
116 hp / 85 kw
(-33%) |
Power to torque ratio | 54 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 64.4 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 Duratec 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 22 % |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 72.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 58 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68 points |
In Focus Ford Focus horsepower was between 75 and 215 hp or 55 and 158 kW.
Ford Focus horsepower to weight ratio in Focus is shown in the chart.
Ford Focus horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 16V |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
+30% | 20 hp / 15 kw | 25 hp / 19 kw | 62.5 points |
2.0 16V |
131 hp / 96 kw
(-24%) |
+24% | 26 hp / 19 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 65.5 points |
1.4 16V |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
+40% | 15 hp / 11 kw | 19 hp / 14 kw | 53.6 points |
1.6 i Duratec 8V |
98 hp / 72 kw
(-43%) |
+30% | 20 hp / 14 kw | 25 hp / 18 kw | 61.3 points |
1.8 DI |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
+57% | 15 hp / 11 kw | 19 hp / 14 kw | 41.7 points |
1.8 16V |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+28% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 63.9 points |
1.8 TDCi |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+54% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 63.9 points |
1.8 Turbo DI |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
+55% | 18 hp / 13 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 50 points |
2.0 16V ST170 |
172 hp / 127 kw
(-1%) |
+13% | 34 hp / 25 kw | 43 hp / 32 kw | 86 points |
2.0 i 16V RS |
215 hp / 158 kw
(+24%) |
+31% | 43 hp / 32 kw | 54 hp / 40 kw | 107.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 25 hp / 19 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 62.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
131 hp / 96 kw
(-24%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 65.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.4 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
Power to torque ratio | 40 % |
Power per passenger | 15 hp / 11 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 19 hp / 14 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 53.6 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 i Duratec 8V |
Power (difference from average) |
98 hp / 72 kw
(-43%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 20 hp / 14 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 61.3 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 DI |
Power (difference from average) |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 15 hp / 11 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 19 hp / 14 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 41.7 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 63.9 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 54 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 63.9 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 Turbo DI |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | 55 % |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 50 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V ST170 |
Power (difference from average) |
172 hp / 127 kw
(-1%) |
Power to torque ratio | 13 % |
Power per passenger | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 43 hp / 32 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 86 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V RS |
Power (difference from average) |
215 hp / 158 kw
(+24%) |
Power to torque ratio | 31 % |
Power per passenger | 43 hp / 32 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 54 hp / 40 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 107.5 points |
In Focus Ford Focus horsepower was between 75 and 173 hp or 55 and 127 kW.
Ford Focus horsepower to weight ratio in Focus is shown in the chart.
Ford Focus horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 16V |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
+30% | 20 hp / 15 kw | 25 hp / 19 kw | 62.5 points |
1.4 16V |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
+40% | 15 hp / 11 kw | 19 hp / 14 kw | 53.6 points |
1.8 DI |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
+57% | 15 hp / 11 kw | 19 hp / 14 kw | 41.7 points |
1.8 16V |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+28% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 63.9 points |
1.6 i Duratec 8V |
98 hp / 72 kw
(-43%) |
+30% | 20 hp / 14 kw | 25 hp / 18 kw | 61.3 points |
1.8 TDCi |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+54% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 63.9 points |
2.0 16V |
131 hp / 96 kw
(-24%) |
+24% | 26 hp / 19 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 65.5 points |
1.8 Turbo DI |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
+55% | 18 hp / 13 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 50 points |
2.0 i 16V ST170 |
173 hp / 127 kw
(0%) |
+12% | 35 hp / 25 kw | 43 hp / 32 kw | 86.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 25 hp / 19 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 62.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.4 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
Power to torque ratio | 40 % |
Power per passenger | 15 hp / 11 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 19 hp / 14 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 53.6 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 DI |
Power (difference from average) |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 15 hp / 11 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 19 hp / 14 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 41.7 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 63.9 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 i Duratec 8V |
Power (difference from average) |
98 hp / 72 kw
(-43%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 20 hp / 14 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 61.3 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 54 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 63.9 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
131 hp / 96 kw
(-24%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 65.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 Turbo DI |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | 55 % |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 50 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V ST170 |
Power (difference from average) |
173 hp / 127 kw
(0%) |
Power to torque ratio | 12 % |
Power per passenger | 35 hp / 25 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 43 hp / 32 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 86.5 points |
In 2000 Ford Focus horsepower was between 110 and 172 hp or 81 and 127 kW.
Ford Focus horsepower to weight ratio in 2000 is shown in the chart.
Ford Focus horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i 16V SVT |
172 hp / 127 kw
(-1%) |
+12% | 34 hp / 25 kw | 43 hp / 32 kw | 86 points |
2.0 i 16V ZX3 |
131 hp / 96 kw
(-24%) |
+28% | 26 hp / 19 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 65.5 points |
2.0 i 16V ZX5 |
131 hp / 96 kw
(-24%) |
+28% | 26 hp / 19 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 65.5 points |
2.0 i LX |
110 hp / 81 kw
(-36%) |
+35% | 22 hp / 16 kw | 28 hp / 20 kw | 55 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V SVT |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
172 hp / 127 kw
(-1%) |
Power to torque ratio | 12 % |
Power per passenger | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 43 hp / 32 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 86 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V ZX3 |
Power (difference from average) |
131 hp / 96 kw
(-24%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 65.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V ZX5 |
Power (difference from average) |
131 hp / 96 kw
(-24%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 65.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i LX |
Power (difference from average) |
110 hp / 81 kw
(-36%) |
Power to torque ratio | 35 % |
Power per passenger | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 55 points |
In 2000 Ford Focus horsepower was between 131 and 147 hp or 96 and 108 kW.
Ford Focus horsepower to weight ratio in 2000 is shown in the chart.
Ford Focus horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i 16V SE |
131 hp / 96 kw
(-24%) |
+28% | 26 hp / 19 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 65.5 points |
2.3 i 16V ZXW |
147 hp / 108 kw
(-15%) |
+27% | 29 hp / 22 kw | 37 hp / 27 kw | 63.9 points |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V SE |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
131 hp / 96 kw
(-24%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 65.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.3 i 16V ZXW |
Power (difference from average) |
147 hp / 108 kw
(-15%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 37 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 63.9 points |
In 2000 Ford Focus horsepower was between 111 and 153 hp or 82 and 113 kW.
Ford Focus horsepower to weight ratio in 2000 is shown in the chart.
Ford Focus horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i 16V ZTS |
131 hp / 96 kw
(-24%) |
+28% | 26 hp / 19 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 65.5 points |
2.0 i LX/SE |
111 hp / 82 kw
(-36%) |
+34% | 22 hp / 16 kw | 28 hp / 21 kw | 55.5 points |
2.3 i 16V ST |
153 hp / 113 kw
(-12%) |
+27% | 31 hp / 23 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 66.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V ZTS |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
131 hp / 96 kw
(-24%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 65.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i LX/SE |
Power (difference from average) |
111 hp / 82 kw
(-36%) |
Power to torque ratio | 34 % |
Power per passenger | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 55.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.3 i 16V ST |
Power (difference from average) |
153 hp / 113 kw
(-12%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 31 hp / 23 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 66.5 points |
In Focus Ford Focus horsepower was between 75 and 131 hp or 55 and 96 kW.
Ford Focus horsepower to weight ratio in Focus is shown in the chart.
Ford Focus horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 16V |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
+30% | 20 hp / 15 kw | 25 hp / 19 kw | 62.5 points |
2.0 16V |
131 hp / 96 kw
(-24%) |
+24% | 26 hp / 19 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 65.5 points |
1.4 16V |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
+40% | 15 hp / 11 kw | 19 hp / 14 kw | 53.6 points |
1.6 i Duratec 8V |
98 hp / 72 kw
(-43%) |
+30% | 20 hp / 14 kw | 25 hp / 18 kw | 61.3 points |
1.8 16V |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+28% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 63.9 points |
1.8 TDCi |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+54% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 63.9 points |
1.8 Turbo DI |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
+55% | 18 hp / 13 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 50 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 25 hp / 19 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 62.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
131 hp / 96 kw
(-24%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 65.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.4 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
Power to torque ratio | 40 % |
Power per passenger | 15 hp / 11 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 19 hp / 14 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 53.6 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 i Duratec 8V |
Power (difference from average) |
98 hp / 72 kw
(-43%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 20 hp / 14 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 61.3 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 63.9 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 54 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 63.9 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 Turbo DI |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | 55 % |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 50 points |