2018 F-150 XIII SuperCrew (facelift 2018)
2018 F-150 XIII SuperCab (facelift 2018)
2018 F-150 XIII Regular Cab (facelift 2018)
2015 F-150 XIII SuperCrew
2015 F-150 XIII SuperCab
2015 F-150 XIII Regular Cab
2009 F-150 XII SuperCab
2009 F-150 XII SuperCrew
2009 F-150 XII Regular Cab
2004 F-150 XI SuperCrew
2004 F-150 XI SuperCab
2004 F-150 XI Regular Cab
1999 F-150 X SuperCrew
1997 F-150 X SuperCab
1997 F-150 X Regular Cab
1992 F-150 IX Regular Cab
1992 F-150 IX SuperCab
1987 F-150 VIII Regular Cab
In 2018 Ford F-150 horsepower was between 290 and 450 hp or 213 and 331 kW.
Ford F-150 horsepower to weight ratio in 2018 is shown in the chart.
Ford F-150 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Raptor 3.5 V6 |
450 hp / 331 kw
(+160%) |
+35% | 90 hp / 66 kw | 75 hp / 55 kw | 128.6 points |
2.7 V6 |
325 hp / 239 kw
(+88%) |
+40% | 65 hp / 48 kw | 54 hp / 40 kw | 120.4 points |
3.3 V6 |
290 hp / 213 kw
(+68%) |
+19% | 58 hp / 43 kw | 48 hp / 36 kw | 87.9 points |
3.5 V6 |
375 hp / 276 kw
(+117%) |
+41% | 75 hp / 55 kw | 63 hp / 46 kw | 107.1 points |
5.0 V8 |
395 hp / 291 kw
(+128%) |
+27% | 79 hp / 58 kw | 49 hp / 36 kw | 80.6 points |
Vehicle | Raptor 3.5 V6 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
450 hp / 331 kw
(+160%) |
Power to torque ratio | 35 % |
Power per passenger | 90 hp / 66 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 75 hp / 55 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 128.6 points |
Vehicle | 2.7 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
325 hp / 239 kw
(+88%) |
Power to torque ratio | 40 % |
Power per passenger | 65 hp / 48 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 54 hp / 40 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 120.4 points |
Vehicle | 3.3 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
290 hp / 213 kw
(+68%) |
Power to torque ratio | 19 % |
Power per passenger | 58 hp / 43 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 48 hp / 36 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 87.9 points |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
375 hp / 276 kw
(+117%) |
Power to torque ratio | 41 % |
Power per passenger | 75 hp / 55 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 63 hp / 46 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 107.1 points |
Vehicle | 5.0 V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
395 hp / 291 kw
(+128%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 79 hp / 58 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 49 hp / 36 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 80.6 points |
In 2018 Ford F-150 horsepower was between 290 and 450 hp or 213 and 331 kW.
Ford F-150 horsepower to weight ratio in 2018 is shown in the chart.
Ford F-150 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Raptor 3.5 V6 |
450 hp / 331 kw
(+160%) |
+35% | 90 hp / 66 kw | 75 hp / 55 kw | 128.6 points |
2.7 V6 |
325 hp / 239 kw
(+88%) |
+40% | 65 hp / 48 kw | 54 hp / 40 kw | 120.4 points |
3.3 V6 |
290 hp / 213 kw
(+68%) |
+19% | 58 hp / 43 kw | 48 hp / 36 kw | 87.9 points |
3.5 V6 |
375 hp / 276 kw
(+117%) |
+41% | 75 hp / 55 kw | 63 hp / 46 kw | 107.1 points |
5.0 V8 |
395 hp / 291 kw
(+128%) |
+27% | 79 hp / 58 kw | 49 hp / 36 kw | 80.6 points |
Vehicle | Raptor 3.5 V6 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
450 hp / 331 kw
(+160%) |
Power to torque ratio | 35 % |
Power per passenger | 90 hp / 66 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 75 hp / 55 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 128.6 points |
Vehicle | 2.7 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
325 hp / 239 kw
(+88%) |
Power to torque ratio | 40 % |
Power per passenger | 65 hp / 48 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 54 hp / 40 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 120.4 points |
Vehicle | 3.3 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
290 hp / 213 kw
(+68%) |
Power to torque ratio | 19 % |
Power per passenger | 58 hp / 43 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 48 hp / 36 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 87.9 points |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
375 hp / 276 kw
(+117%) |
Power to torque ratio | 41 % |
Power per passenger | 75 hp / 55 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 63 hp / 46 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 107.1 points |
Vehicle | 5.0 V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
395 hp / 291 kw
(+128%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 79 hp / 58 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 49 hp / 36 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 80.6 points |
In 2018 Ford F-150 horsepower was between 290 and 395 hp or 213 and 291 kW.
Ford F-150 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.7 V6 |
325 hp / 239 kw
(+88%) |
+40% | 108 hp / 80 kw | 54 hp / 40 kw | 120.4 points |
3.3 V6 |
290 hp / 213 kw
(+68%) |
+19% | 97 hp / 71 kw | 48 hp / 36 kw | 87.9 points |
5.0 V8 |
395 hp / 291 kw
(+128%) |
+27% | 132 hp / 97 kw | 49 hp / 36 kw | 80.6 points |
3.5 V6 |
375 hp / 276 kw
(+117%) |
+41% | 125 hp / 92 kw | 63 hp / 46 kw | 107.1 points |
Vehicle | 2.7 V6 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
325 hp / 239 kw
(+88%) |
Power to torque ratio | 40 % |
Power per passenger | 108 hp / 80 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 54 hp / 40 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 120.4 points |
Vehicle | 3.3 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
290 hp / 213 kw
(+68%) |
Power to torque ratio | 19 % |
Power per passenger | 97 hp / 71 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 48 hp / 36 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 87.9 points |
Vehicle | 5.0 V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
395 hp / 291 kw
(+128%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 132 hp / 97 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 49 hp / 36 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 80.6 points |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
375 hp / 276 kw
(+117%) |
Power to torque ratio | 41 % |
Power per passenger | 125 hp / 92 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 63 hp / 46 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 107.1 points |
In 2015 Ford F-150 horsepower was between 325 and 385 hp or 239 and 283 kW.
Ford F-150 horsepower to weight ratio in 2015 is shown in the chart.
Ford F-150 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.5 V6 |
375 hp / 276 kw
(+117%) |
+41% | 75 hp / 55 kw | 63 hp / 46 kw | 107.1 points |
2.7 V6 |
325 hp / 239 kw
(+88%) |
+36% | 65 hp / 48 kw | 54 hp / 40 kw | 120.4 points |
5.0 V8 |
385 hp / 283 kw
(+123%) |
+27% | 77 hp / 57 kw | 48 hp / 35 kw | 78.6 points |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
375 hp / 276 kw
(+117%) |
Power to torque ratio | 41 % |
Power per passenger | 75 hp / 55 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 63 hp / 46 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 107.1 points |
Vehicle | 2.7 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
325 hp / 239 kw
(+88%) |
Power to torque ratio | 36 % |
Power per passenger | 65 hp / 48 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 54 hp / 40 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 120.4 points |
Vehicle | 5.0 V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
385 hp / 283 kw
(+123%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 77 hp / 57 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 48 hp / 35 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 78.6 points |
In 2015 Ford F-150 horsepower was between 325 and 385 hp or 239 and 283 kW.
Ford F-150 horsepower to weight ratio in 2015 is shown in the chart.
Ford F-150 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.7 V6 |
325 hp / 239 kw
(+88%) |
+36% | 65 hp / 48 kw | 54 hp / 40 kw | 120.4 points |
5.0 V8 |
385 hp / 283 kw
(+123%) |
+27% | 77 hp / 57 kw | 48 hp / 35 kw | 78.6 points |
3.5 V6 |
375 hp / 276 kw
(+117%) |
+41% | 75 hp / 55 kw | 63 hp / 46 kw | 107.1 points |
Vehicle | 2.7 V6 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
325 hp / 239 kw
(+88%) |
Power to torque ratio | 36 % |
Power per passenger | 65 hp / 48 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 54 hp / 40 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 120.4 points |
Vehicle | 5.0 V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
385 hp / 283 kw
(+123%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 77 hp / 57 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 48 hp / 35 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 78.6 points |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
375 hp / 276 kw
(+117%) |
Power to torque ratio | 41 % |
Power per passenger | 75 hp / 55 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 63 hp / 46 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 107.1 points |
In 2015 Ford F-150 horsepower was between 325 and 385 hp or 239 and 283 kW.
Ford F-150 horsepower to weight ratio in 2015 is shown in the chart.
Ford F-150 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.7 V6 |
325 hp / 239 kw
(+88%) |
+36% | 108 hp / 80 kw | 54 hp / 40 kw | 120.4 points |
3.5 V6 |
375 hp / 276 kw
(+117%) |
+41% | 125 hp / 92 kw | 63 hp / 46 kw | 107.1 points |
5.0 V8 |
385 hp / 283 kw
(+123%) |
+27% | 128 hp / 94 kw | 48 hp / 35 kw | 78.6 points |
Vehicle | 2.7 V6 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
325 hp / 239 kw
(+88%) |
Power to torque ratio | 36 % |
Power per passenger | 108 hp / 80 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 54 hp / 40 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 120.4 points |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
375 hp / 276 kw
(+117%) |
Power to torque ratio | 41 % |
Power per passenger | 125 hp / 92 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 63 hp / 46 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 107.1 points |
Vehicle | 5.0 V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
385 hp / 283 kw
(+123%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 128 hp / 94 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 48 hp / 35 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 78.6 points |
In 2009 Ford F-150 horsepower was between 292 and 411 hp or 215 and 302 kW.
Ford F-150 horsepower to weight ratio in 2009 is shown in the chart.
Ford F-150 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.6 V8 |
292 hp / 215 kw
(+69%) |
+33% | 58 hp / 43 kw | 37 hp / 27 kw | 63.5 points |
5.4 V8 |
320 hp / 235 kw
(+85%) |
+40% | 64 hp / 47 kw | 40 hp / 29 kw | 59.3 points |
3.7 V6 |
302 hp / 222 kw
(+75%) |
+20% | 60 hp / 44 kw | 50 hp / 37 kw | 81.6 points |
5.0 V8 |
360 hp / 265 kw
(+108%) |
+30% | 72 hp / 53 kw | 45 hp / 33 kw | 73.5 points |
3.5 V6 EcoBoost |
365 hp / 268 kw
(+111%) |
+36% | 73 hp / 54 kw | 61 hp / 45 kw | 104.3 points |
SVT Raptor 6.2 V8 |
411 hp / 302 kw
(+138%) |
+30% | 82 hp / 60 kw | 51 hp / 38 kw | 66.3 points |
Vehicle | 4.6 V8 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
292 hp / 215 kw
(+69%) |
Power to torque ratio | 33 % |
Power per passenger | 58 hp / 43 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 37 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 63.5 points |
Vehicle | 5.4 V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
320 hp / 235 kw
(+85%) |
Power to torque ratio | 40 % |
Power per passenger | 64 hp / 47 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 59.3 points |
Vehicle | 3.7 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
302 hp / 222 kw
(+75%) |
Power to torque ratio | 20 % |
Power per passenger | 60 hp / 44 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 50 hp / 37 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 81.6 points |
Vehicle | 5.0 V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
360 hp / 265 kw
(+108%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 72 hp / 53 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 45 hp / 33 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 73.5 points |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 EcoBoost |
Power (difference from average) |
365 hp / 268 kw
(+111%) |
Power to torque ratio | 36 % |
Power per passenger | 73 hp / 54 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 61 hp / 45 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 104.3 points |
Vehicle | SVT Raptor 6.2 V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
411 hp / 302 kw
(+138%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 82 hp / 60 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 51 hp / 38 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 66.3 points |
In 2009 Ford F-150 horsepower was between 248 and 411 hp or 182 and 302 kW.
Ford F-150 horsepower to weight ratio in 2009 is shown in the chart.
Ford F-150 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.6 V8 |
248 hp / 182 kw
(+43%) |
+38% | 50 hp / 36 kw | 31 hp / 23 kw | 53.9 points |
5.4 V8 |
310 hp / 228 kw
(+79%) |
+37% | 62 hp / 46 kw | 39 hp / 29 kw | 57.4 points |
5.0 V8 |
360 hp / 265 kw
(+108%) |
+30% | 72 hp / 53 kw | 45 hp / 33 kw | 73.5 points |
3.7 V6 |
302 hp / 222 kw
(+75%) |
+20% | 60 hp / 44 kw | 50 hp / 37 kw | 81.6 points |
6.2 V8 |
411 hp / 302 kw
(+138%) |
+30% | 82 hp / 60 kw | 51 hp / 38 kw | 66.3 points |
3.5 V6 EcoBoost |
365 hp / 268 kw
(+111%) |
+36% | 73 hp / 54 kw | 61 hp / 45 kw | 104.3 points |
SVT Raptor 6.2 V8 |
411 hp / 302 kw
(+138%) |
+30% | 82 hp / 60 kw | 51 hp / 38 kw | 66.3 points |
Vehicle | 4.6 V8 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
248 hp / 182 kw
(+43%) |
Power to torque ratio | 38 % |
Power per passenger | 50 hp / 36 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 31 hp / 23 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 53.9 points |
Vehicle | 5.4 V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
310 hp / 228 kw
(+79%) |
Power to torque ratio | 37 % |
Power per passenger | 62 hp / 46 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 39 hp / 29 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 57.4 points |
Vehicle | 5.0 V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
360 hp / 265 kw
(+108%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 72 hp / 53 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 45 hp / 33 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 73.5 points |
Vehicle | 3.7 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
302 hp / 222 kw
(+75%) |
Power to torque ratio | 20 % |
Power per passenger | 60 hp / 44 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 50 hp / 37 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 81.6 points |
Vehicle | 6.2 V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
411 hp / 302 kw
(+138%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 82 hp / 60 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 51 hp / 38 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 66.3 points |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 EcoBoost |
Power (difference from average) |
365 hp / 268 kw
(+111%) |
Power to torque ratio | 36 % |
Power per passenger | 73 hp / 54 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 61 hp / 45 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 104.3 points |
Vehicle | SVT Raptor 6.2 V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
411 hp / 302 kw
(+138%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 82 hp / 60 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 51 hp / 38 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 66.3 points |
In 2009 Ford F-150 horsepower was between 292 and 365 hp or 215 and 268 kW.
Ford F-150 horsepower to weight ratio in 2009 is shown in the chart.
Ford F-150 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.6 V8 |
292 hp / 215 kw
(+69%) |
+33% | 97 hp / 72 kw | 37 hp / 27 kw | 63.5 points |
5.4 V8 |
320 hp / 235 kw
(+85%) |
+40% | 107 hp / 78 kw | 40 hp / 29 kw | 59.3 points |
3.7 V6 |
302 hp / 222 kw
(+75%) |
+20% | 101 hp / 74 kw | 50 hp / 37 kw | 81.6 points |
5.0 V8 |
360 hp / 265 kw
(+108%) |
+30% | 120 hp / 88 kw | 45 hp / 33 kw | 73.5 points |
3.5 V6 EcoBoost |
365 hp / 268 kw
(+111%) |
+36% | 122 hp / 89 kw | 61 hp / 45 kw | 104.3 points |
Vehicle | 4.6 V8 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
292 hp / 215 kw
(+69%) |
Power to torque ratio | 33 % |
Power per passenger | 97 hp / 72 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 37 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 63.5 points |
Vehicle | 5.4 V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
320 hp / 235 kw
(+85%) |
Power to torque ratio | 40 % |
Power per passenger | 107 hp / 78 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 59.3 points |
Vehicle | 3.7 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
302 hp / 222 kw
(+75%) |
Power to torque ratio | 20 % |
Power per passenger | 101 hp / 74 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 50 hp / 37 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 81.6 points |
Vehicle | 5.0 V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
360 hp / 265 kw
(+108%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 120 hp / 88 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 45 hp / 33 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 73.5 points |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 EcoBoost |
Power (difference from average) |
365 hp / 268 kw
(+111%) |
Power to torque ratio | 36 % |
Power per passenger | 122 hp / 89 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 61 hp / 45 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 104.3 points |
In 2004 Ford F-150 horsepower was between 248 and 300 hp or 182 and 221 kW.
Ford F-150 horsepower to weight ratio in 2004 is shown in the chart.
Ford F-150 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.6 V8 Triton |
248 hp / 182 kw
(+43%) |
+38% | 50 hp / 36 kw | 31 hp / 23 kw | 53.9 points |
5.4 V8 Triton |
300 hp / 221 kw
(+73%) |
+39% | 60 hp / 44 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 55.6 points |
Vehicle | 4.6 V8 Triton |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
248 hp / 182 kw
(+43%) |
Power to torque ratio | 38 % |
Power per passenger | 50 hp / 36 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 31 hp / 23 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 53.9 points |
Vehicle | 5.4 V8 Triton |
Power (difference from average) |
300 hp / 221 kw
(+73%) |
Power to torque ratio | 39 % |
Power per passenger | 60 hp / 44 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 55.6 points |
In 2004 Ford F-150 horsepower was between 248 and 300 hp or 182 and 221 kW.
Ford F-150 horsepower to weight ratio in 2004 is shown in the chart.
Ford F-150 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.6 V8 Triton |
248 hp / 182 kw
(+43%) |
+38% | 50 hp / 36 kw | 31 hp / 23 kw | 53.9 points |
5.4 V8 Triton |
300 hp / 221 kw
(+73%) |
+39% | 60 hp / 44 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 55.6 points |
Vehicle | 4.6 V8 Triton |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
248 hp / 182 kw
(+43%) |
Power to torque ratio | 38 % |
Power per passenger | 50 hp / 36 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 31 hp / 23 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 53.9 points |
Vehicle | 5.4 V8 Triton |
Power (difference from average) |
300 hp / 221 kw
(+73%) |
Power to torque ratio | 39 % |
Power per passenger | 60 hp / 44 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 55.6 points |
In 2004 Ford F-150 horsepower was between 202 and 300 hp or 149 and 221 kW.
Ford F-150 horsepower to weight ratio in 2004 is shown in the chart.
Ford F-150 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5.4 V8 Triton |
300 hp / 221 kw
(+73%) |
+39% | 100 hp / 74 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 55.6 points |
4.6 V8 Triton |
231 hp / 170 kw
(+34%) |
+42% | 77 hp / 57 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 50.2 points |
4.2 V6 |
202 hp / 149 kw
(+17%) |
+43% | 67 hp / 50 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 48.1 points |
Vehicle | 5.4 V8 Triton |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
300 hp / 221 kw
(+73%) |
Power to torque ratio | 39 % |
Power per passenger | 100 hp / 74 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 55.6 points |
Vehicle | 4.6 V8 Triton |
Power (difference from average) |
231 hp / 170 kw
(+34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 42 % |
Power per passenger | 77 hp / 57 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 50.2 points |
Vehicle | 4.2 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
202 hp / 149 kw
(+17%) |
Power to torque ratio | 43 % |
Power per passenger | 67 hp / 50 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 48.1 points |
In 1999 Ford F-150 horsepower was between 231 and 340 hp or 170 and 250 kW.
Ford F-150 horsepower to weight ratio in 1999 is shown in the chart.
Ford F-150 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.6 V8 Triton |
231 hp / 170 kw
(+34%) |
+42% | 46 hp / 34 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 50.2 points |
5.4 V8 Triton |
260 hp / 191 kw
(+50%) |
+45% | 52 hp / 38 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 48.1 points |
Harley-Davidson 5.4 V8 |
340 hp / 250 kw
(+97%) |
+41% | 85 hp / 63 kw | 43 hp / 31 kw | 63 points |
Vehicle | 4.6 V8 Triton |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
231 hp / 170 kw
(+34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 42 % |
Power per passenger | 46 hp / 34 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 50.2 points |
Vehicle | 5.4 V8 Triton |
Power (difference from average) |
260 hp / 191 kw
(+50%) |
Power to torque ratio | 45 % |
Power per passenger | 52 hp / 38 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 48.1 points |
Vehicle | Harley-Davidson 5.4 V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
340 hp / 250 kw
(+97%) |
Power to torque ratio | 41 % |
Power per passenger | 85 hp / 63 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 43 hp / 31 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 63 points |
In 1997 Ford F-150 horsepower was between 202 and 235 hp or 149 and 173 kW.
Ford F-150 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.2 V6 |
202 hp / 149 kw
(+17%) |
+41% | 40 hp / 30 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 48.1 points |
4.6 V8 Triton |
220 hp / 162 kw
(+27%) |
+44% | 44 hp / 32 kw | 28 hp / 20 kw | 47.8 points |
5.4 V8 Triton |
235 hp / 173 kw
(+36%) |
+47% | 47 hp / 35 kw | 29 hp / 22 kw | 43.5 points |
Vehicle | 4.2 V6 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
202 hp / 149 kw
(+17%) |
Power to torque ratio | 41 % |
Power per passenger | 40 hp / 30 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 48.1 points |
Vehicle | 4.6 V8 Triton |
Power (difference from average) |
220 hp / 162 kw
(+27%) |
Power to torque ratio | 44 % |
Power per passenger | 44 hp / 32 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 47.8 points |
Vehicle | 5.4 V8 Triton |
Power (difference from average) |
235 hp / 173 kw
(+36%) |
Power to torque ratio | 47 % |
Power per passenger | 47 hp / 35 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 22 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 43.5 points |
In 1997 Ford F-150 horsepower was between 202 and 380 hp or 149 and 279 kW.
Ford F-150 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.2 V6 |
202 hp / 149 kw
(+17%) |
+41% | 67 hp / 50 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 48.1 points |
4.6 V8 Triton |
220 hp / 162 kw
(+27%) |
+44% | 73 hp / 54 kw | 28 hp / 20 kw | 47.8 points |
5.4 V8 Triton |
235 hp / 173 kw
(+36%) |
+47% | 78 hp / 58 kw | 29 hp / 22 kw | 43.5 points |
SVT Lightning 5.4 V8 |
380 hp / 279 kw
(+120%) |
+38% | 127 hp / 93 kw | 48 hp / 35 kw | 70.4 points |
Vehicle | 4.2 V6 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
202 hp / 149 kw
(+17%) |
Power to torque ratio | 41 % |
Power per passenger | 67 hp / 50 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 48.1 points |
Vehicle | 4.6 V8 Triton |
Power (difference from average) |
220 hp / 162 kw
(+27%) |
Power to torque ratio | 44 % |
Power per passenger | 73 hp / 54 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 47.8 points |
Vehicle | 5.4 V8 Triton |
Power (difference from average) |
235 hp / 173 kw
(+36%) |
Power to torque ratio | 47 % |
Power per passenger | 78 hp / 58 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 22 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 43.5 points |
Vehicle | SVT Lightning 5.4 V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
380 hp / 279 kw
(+120%) |
Power to torque ratio | 38 % |
Power per passenger | 127 hp / 93 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 48 hp / 35 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70.4 points |
In 1992 Ford F-150 horsepower was between 150 and 240 hp or 110 and 177 kW.
Ford F-150 horsepower to weight ratio in 1992 is shown in the chart.
Ford F-150 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.9 |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+58% | 50 hp / 37 kw | 25 hp / 18 kw | 30.6 points |
5.0 V8 |
195 hp / 143 kw
(+13%) |
- | 65 hp / 48 kw | 24 hp / 18 kw | 39.8 points |
5.8 V8 |
210 hp / 154 kw
(+21%) |
+51% | 70 hp / 51 kw | 26 hp / 19 kw | 36.2 points |
SVT Lightning 5.8 V8 |
240 hp / 177 kw
(+39%) |
+48% | 120 hp / 89 kw | 30 hp / 22 kw | 41.4 points |
Vehicle | 4.9 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 58 % |
Power per passenger | 50 hp / 37 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 30.6 points |
Vehicle | 5.0 V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
195 hp / 143 kw
(+13%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 65 hp / 48 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 39.8 points |
Vehicle | 5.8 V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
210 hp / 154 kw
(+21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 51 % |
Power per passenger | 70 hp / 51 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 36.2 points |
Vehicle | SVT Lightning 5.8 V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
240 hp / 177 kw
(+39%) |
Power to torque ratio | 48 % |
Power per passenger | 120 hp / 89 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 41.4 points |
In 1992 Ford F-150 horsepower was between 150 and 210 hp or 110 and 154 kW.
Ford F-150 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.9 |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+58% | 30 hp / 22 kw | 25 hp / 18 kw | 30.6 points |
5.0 V8 |
195 hp / 143 kw
(+13%) |
- | 39 hp / 29 kw | 24 hp / 18 kw | 39.8 points |
5.8 V8 |
210 hp / 154 kw
(+21%) |
+51% | 42 hp / 31 kw | 26 hp / 19 kw | 36.2 points |
Vehicle | 4.9 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 58 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 30.6 points |
Vehicle | 5.0 V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
195 hp / 143 kw
(+13%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 39 hp / 29 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 39.8 points |
Vehicle | 5.8 V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
210 hp / 154 kw
(+21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 51 % |
Power per passenger | 42 hp / 31 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 36.2 points |
In 1987 Ford F-150 horsepower was between 145 and 210 hp or 107 and 154 kW.
Ford F-150 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5.0 V8 Windsor |
185 hp / 136 kw
(+7%) |
+49% | 62 hp / 45 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 37.8 points |
5.8 V8 Windsor |
210 hp / 154 kw
(+21%) |
+49% | 70 hp / 51 kw | 26 hp / 19 kw | 36.2 points |
4.9 300 Six |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
+60% | 48 hp / 36 kw | 24 hp / 18 kw | 29.6 points |
Vehicle | 5.0 V8 Windsor |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
185 hp / 136 kw
(+7%) |
Power to torque ratio | 49 % |
Power per passenger | 62 hp / 45 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 37.8 points |
Vehicle | 5.8 V8 Windsor |
Power (difference from average) |
210 hp / 154 kw
(+21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 49 % |
Power per passenger | 70 hp / 51 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 36.2 points |
Vehicle | 4.9 300 Six |
Power (difference from average) |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 60 % |
Power per passenger | 48 hp / 36 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 29.6 points |