In 2020 Ford Escape horsepower was between 162 and 250 hp or 119 and 184 kW.
Ford Escape horsepower to weight ratio in 2020 is shown in the chart.
Ford Escape horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5 EcoBoost |
180 hp / 132 kw
(+4%) |
+25% | 36 hp / 26 kw | 60 hp / 44 kw | 120 points |
2.0 EcoBoost |
250 hp / 184 kw
(+45%) |
+33% | 50 hp / 37 kw | 63 hp / 46 kw | 125 points |
2.5L |
162 hp / 119 kw
(-6%) |
+23% | 32 hp / 24 kw | 41 hp / 30 kw | 64.8 points |
Vehicle | 1.5 EcoBoost |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
180 hp / 132 kw
(+4%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 60 hp / 44 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 120 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBoost |
Power (difference from average) |
250 hp / 184 kw
(+45%) |
Power to torque ratio | 33 % |
Power per passenger | 50 hp / 37 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 63 hp / 46 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 125 points |
Vehicle | 2.5L |
Power (difference from average) |
162 hp / 119 kw
(-6%) |
Power to torque ratio | 23 % |
Power per passenger | 32 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 64.8 points |
In 2017 Ford Escape horsepower was between 168 and 245 hp or 124 and 180 kW.
Ford Escape horsepower to weight ratio in 2017 is shown in the chart.
Ford Escape horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 Duratec |
168 hp / 124 kw
(-3%) |
+27% | 34 hp / 25 kw | 42 hp / 31 kw | 67.2 points |
2.0 EcoBoost |
245 hp / 180 kw
(+42%) |
+34% | 49 hp / 36 kw | 61 hp / 45 kw | 122.5 points |
1.5 EcoBoost |
179 hp / 132 kw
(+3%) |
+25% | 36 hp / 26 kw | 45 hp / 33 kw | 119.3 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 Duratec |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
168 hp / 124 kw
(-3%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 42 hp / 31 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 67.2 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBoost |
Power (difference from average) |
245 hp / 180 kw
(+42%) |
Power to torque ratio | 34 % |
Power per passenger | 49 hp / 36 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 61 hp / 45 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 122.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.5 EcoBoost |
Power (difference from average) |
179 hp / 132 kw
(+3%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 45 hp / 33 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 119.3 points |
In 2013 Ford Escape horsepower was between 168 and 240 hp or 124 and 177 kW.
Ford Escape horsepower to weight ratio in 2013 is shown in the chart.
Ford Escape horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 Duratec |
168 hp / 124 kw
(-3%) |
+27% | 34 hp / 25 kw | 42 hp / 31 kw | 67.2 points |
1.6 EcoBoost |
178 hp / 131 kw
(+3%) |
+29% | 36 hp / 26 kw | 45 hp / 33 kw | 111.3 points |
2.0 EcoBoost |
240 hp / 177 kw
(+39%) |
+34% | 48 hp / 35 kw | 60 hp / 44 kw | 120 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 Duratec |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
168 hp / 124 kw
(-3%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 42 hp / 31 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 67.2 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 EcoBoost |
Power (difference from average) |
178 hp / 131 kw
(+3%) |
Power to torque ratio | 29 % |
Power per passenger | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 45 hp / 33 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 111.3 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBoost |
Power (difference from average) |
240 hp / 177 kw
(+39%) |
Power to torque ratio | 34 % |
Power per passenger | 48 hp / 35 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 60 hp / 44 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 120 points |
In 2008 Ford Escape horsepower was between 145 and 240 hp or 107 and 177 kW.
Ford Escape horsepower to weight ratio in 2008 is shown in the chart.
Ford Escape horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 L |
153 hp / 113 kw
(-12%) |
+-13% | 31 hp / 23 kw | 26 hp / 19 kw | 61.2 points |
3.0 L |
240 hp / 177 kw
(+39%) |
+-8% | 48 hp / 35 kw | 40 hp / 30 kw | 80 points |
2.3 L |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
+28% | 29 hp / 21 kw | 36 hp / 27 kw | 63 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 L |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
153 hp / 113 kw
(-12%) |
Power to torque ratio | -13 % |
Power per passenger | 31 hp / 23 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 61.2 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 L |
Power (difference from average) |
240 hp / 177 kw
(+39%) |
Power to torque ratio | -8 % |
Power per passenger | 48 hp / 35 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 40 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 80 points |
Vehicle | 2.3 L |
Power (difference from average) |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 63 points |
In 2001 Ford Escape horsepower was between 129 and 203 hp or 95 and 149 kW.
Ford Escape horsepower to weight ratio in 2001 is shown in the chart.
Ford Escape horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.3i 16V |
155 hp / 114 kw
(-10%) |
+25% | 31 hp / 23 kw | 39 hp / 29 kw | 67.4 points |
3.0 i V6 24V XLT 4WD |
203 hp / 149 kw
(+17%) |
+25% | 41 hp / 30 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 67.7 points |
3.0 i V6 24V XLT |
203 hp / 149 kw
(+17%) |
+25% | 41 hp / 30 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 67.7 points |
2.3 i 16V Hybrid AWD |
135 hp / 99 kw
(-22%) |
+23% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 58.7 points |
2.3 i 16V Hybrid |
135 hp / 99 kw
(-22%) |
+23% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 58.7 points |
2.0 i 16V XLS 4WD |
129 hp / 95 kw
(-25%) |
+30% | 26 hp / 19 kw | 32 hp / 24 kw | 64.5 points |
2.0 i 16V XLS |
129 hp / 95 kw
(-25%) |
+30% | 26 hp / 19 kw | 32 hp / 24 kw | 64.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.3i 16V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
155 hp / 114 kw
(-10%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 31 hp / 23 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 39 hp / 29 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 67.4 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 i V6 24V XLT 4WD |
Power (difference from average) |
203 hp / 149 kw
(+17%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 67.7 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 i V6 24V XLT |
Power (difference from average) |
203 hp / 149 kw
(+17%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 67.7 points |
Vehicle | 2.3 i 16V Hybrid AWD |
Power (difference from average) |
135 hp / 99 kw
(-22%) |
Power to torque ratio | 23 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 58.7 points |
Vehicle | 2.3 i 16V Hybrid |
Power (difference from average) |
135 hp / 99 kw
(-22%) |
Power to torque ratio | 23 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 58.7 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V XLS 4WD |
Power (difference from average) |
129 hp / 95 kw
(-25%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 32 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 64.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V XLS |
Power (difference from average) |
129 hp / 95 kw
(-25%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 32 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 64.5 points |