In 2015 Ford C-MAX horsepower was between 95 and 182 hp or 70 and 134 kW.
Ford C-MAX horsepower to weight ratio in 2015 is shown in the chart.
Ford C-MAX horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5 EcoBoost |
182 hp / 134 kw
(+5%) |
+24% | 36 hp / 27 kw | 46 hp / 34 kw | 121.3 points |
2.0 |
141 hp / 104 kw
(-18%) |
+19% | 28 hp / 21 kw | 35 hp / 26 kw | 70.5 points |
1.0 EcoBoost |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
+41% | 20 hp / 15 kw | 33 hp / 25 kw | 100 points |
2.0 TDCi |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+63% | 30 hp / 22 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 75 points |
1.5 ECOnetic |
105 hp / 77 kw
(-39%) |
+61% | 21 hp / 15 kw | 26 hp / 19 kw | 70 points |
1.6 TDCi |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+47% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 71.9 points |
1.5 TDCi |
95 hp / 70 kw
(-45%) |
+65% | 19 hp / 14 kw | 24 hp / 18 kw | 63.3 points |
1.6 Ti-VCT |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
+25% | 24 hp / 18 kw | 30 hp / 22 kw | 75 points |
Vehicle | 1.5 EcoBoost |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
182 hp / 134 kw
(+5%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 46 hp / 34 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 121.3 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Power (difference from average) |
141 hp / 104 kw
(-18%) |
Power to torque ratio | 19 % |
Power per passenger | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.0 EcoBoost |
Power (difference from average) |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
Power to torque ratio | 41 % |
Power per passenger | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 100 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 63 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75 points |
Vehicle | 1.5 ECOnetic |
Power (difference from average) |
105 hp / 77 kw
(-39%) |
Power to torque ratio | 61 % |
Power per passenger | 21 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 47 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 71.9 points |
Vehicle | 1.5 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
95 hp / 70 kw
(-45%) |
Power to torque ratio | 65 % |
Power per passenger | 19 hp / 14 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 63.3 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 Ti-VCT |
Power (difference from average) |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75 points |
In 2015 Ford C-MAX horsepower was between 100 and 150 hp or 74 and 110 kW.
Ford C-MAX horsepower to weight ratio in 2015 is shown in the chart.
Ford C-MAX horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.0 EcoBoost |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
+41% | 14 hp / 11 kw | 33 hp / 25 kw | 100 points |
1.5 TDCi |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
+56% | 17 hp / 13 kw | 30 hp / 22 kw | 80 points |
1.5 EcoBoost |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+38% | 21 hp / 16 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 100 points |
1.6 Ti-VCT |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
+25% | 17 hp / 13 kw | 30 hp / 22 kw | 75 points |
1.6 TDCi |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+47% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 71.9 points |
2.0 TDCi |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+63% | 30 hp / 22 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 75 points |
Vehicle | 1.0 EcoBoost |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
Power to torque ratio | 41 % |
Power per passenger | 14 hp / 11 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 100 points |
Vehicle | 1.5 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 17 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 80 points |
Vehicle | 1.5 EcoBoost |
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 38 % |
Power per passenger | 21 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 100 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 Ti-VCT |
Power (difference from average) |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 17 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 47 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 71.9 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 63 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75 points |
In 2011 Ford C-MAX horsepower was between 115 and 163 hp or 85 and 120 kW.
Ford C-MAX horsepower to weight ratio in 2011 is shown in the chart.
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 Duratec Ti-VCT |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
+21% | 25 hp / 18 kw | - | - |
2.0 Duratorq TDCi |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
+52% | 33 hp / 24 kw | - | - |
1.6 Duratorq TDCi |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+57% | 23 hp / 17 kw | - | - |
1.0 EcoBoost |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
+26% | 25 hp / 18 kw | - | - |
1.6 EcoBoost SCTi |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+38% | 30 hp / 22 kw | - | - |
Vehicle | 1.6 Duratec Ti-VCT |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
Power to torque ratio | 21 % |
Power per passenger | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 Duratorq TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
Power to torque ratio | 52 % |
Power per passenger | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.6 Duratorq TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.0 EcoBoost |
Power (difference from average) |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.6 EcoBoost SCTi |
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 38 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
In 2011 Ford C-MAX horsepower was between 115 and 150 hp or 85 and 110 kW.
Ford C-MAX horsepower to weight ratio in 2011 is shown in the chart.
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 Duratorq TDCi |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
+56% | 20 hp / 15 kw | - | - |
1.0 EcoBoost |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
+26% | 18 hp / 13 kw | - | - |
1.6 Duratorq TDCi |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+57% | 16 hp / 12 kw | - | - |
1.6 Duratec Ti-VCT |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
+21% | 18 hp / 13 kw | - | - |
1.6 EcoBoost SCTi |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+38% | 21 hp / 16 kw | - | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 Duratorq TDCi |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.0 EcoBoost |
Power (difference from average) |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.6 Duratorq TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 16 hp / 12 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.6 Duratec Ti-VCT |
Power (difference from average) |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
Power to torque ratio | 21 % |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.6 EcoBoost SCTi |
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 38 % |
Power per passenger | 21 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
In 2007 Ford C-MAX horsepower was between 90 and 145 hp or 66 and 107 kW.
Ford C-MAX horsepower to weight ratio in 2007 is shown in the chart.
Ford C-MAX horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 TDCi |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+59% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 63.9 points |
1.6 TDCi |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
+58% | 18 hp / 13 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 56.3 points |
2.0 TDCI |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
+58% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 68 points |
2.0 16V |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
+22% | 29 hp / 21 kw | 36 hp / 27 kw | 72.5 points |
1.8 16V |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
+26% | 25 hp / 18 kw | 31 hp / 23 kw | 69.4 points |
1.6 16V |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
+30% | 20 hp / 15 kw | 25 hp / 19 kw | 62.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 TDCi |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 59 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 63.9 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | 58 % |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 56.3 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDCI |
Power (difference from average) |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 58 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 22 % |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 72.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 31 hp / 23 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 69.4 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 25 hp / 19 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 62.5 points |
In 2004 Ford C-MAX horsepower was between 109 and 145 hp or 80 and 107 kW.
Ford C-MAX horsepower to weight ratio in 2004 is shown in the chart.
Ford C-MAX horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 TDCi |
109 hp / 80 kw
(-37%) |
+55% | 22 hp / 16 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 68.1 points |
1.6 16V |
116 hp / 85 kw
(-33%) |
+25% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 72.5 points |
1.8 16V |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
+24% | 25 hp / 18 kw | 31 hp / 23 kw | 69.4 points |
2.0 |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
+22% | 29 hp / 21 kw | 36 hp / 27 kw | 72.5 points |
2.0 16V |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
+22% | 29 hp / 21 kw | 36 hp / 27 kw | 72.5 points |
2.0 TDCi |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
+58% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 68 points |
1.8 TDCi |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+59% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 63.9 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 TDCi |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
109 hp / 80 kw
(-37%) |
Power to torque ratio | 55 % |
Power per passenger | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68.1 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
116 hp / 85 kw
(-33%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 72.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 31 hp / 23 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 69.4 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Power (difference from average) |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 22 % |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 72.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 22 % |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 72.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 58 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 59 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 63.9 points |