In 2003 Fiat Ulysse horsepower was between 107 and 204 hp or 79 and 150 kW.
Fiat Ulysse horsepower to weight ratio in 2003 is shown in the chart.
Fiat Ulysse horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 16V |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
+28% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 68 points |
3.0 V6 24V |
204 hp / 150 kw
(+18%) |
+28% | 41 hp / 30 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 70.3 points |
2.2 16V JTD |
128 hp / 94 kw
(-26%) |
+59% | 26 hp / 19 kw | 32 hp / 24 kw | 58.2 points |
2.0 16V JTD |
107 hp / 79 kw
(-38%) |
+60% | 21 hp / 16 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 53.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 24V |
Power (difference from average) |
204 hp / 150 kw
(+18%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70.3 points |
Vehicle | 2.2 16V JTD |
Power (difference from average) |
128 hp / 94 kw
(-26%) |
Power to torque ratio | 59 % |
Power per passenger | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 32 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 58.2 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V JTD |
Power (difference from average) |
107 hp / 79 kw
(-38%) |
Power to torque ratio | 60 % |
Power per passenger | 21 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 53.5 points |
In 1994 Fiat Ulysse horsepower was between 90 and 147 hp or 66 and 108 kW.
Fiat Ulysse horsepower to weight ratio in 1994 is shown in the chart.
Fiat Ulysse horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 |
99 hp / 73 kw
(-43%) |
+33% | 20 hp / 15 kw | 25 hp / 18 kw | 55 points |
2.0 |
121 hp / 89 kw
(-30%) |
+29% | 24 hp / 18 kw | 30 hp / 22 kw | 60.5 points |
1.9 TD |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
+54% | 18 hp / 13 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 47.4 points |
2.0 JTD |
109 hp / 80 kw
(-37%) |
+56% | 16 hp / 11 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 54.5 points |
2.0 Turbo |
147 hp / 108 kw
(-15%) |
+37% | 29 hp / 22 kw | 37 hp / 27 kw | 73.5 points |
2.1 TD |
109 hp / 80 kw
(-37%) |
+56% | 18 hp / 13 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 51.9 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
99 hp / 73 kw
(-43%) |
Power to torque ratio | 33 % |
Power per passenger | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 55 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Power (difference from average) |
121 hp / 89 kw
(-30%) |
Power to torque ratio | 29 % |
Power per passenger | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 60.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.9 TD |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | 54 % |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 47.4 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 JTD |
Power (difference from average) |
109 hp / 80 kw
(-37%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 16 hp / 11 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 54.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 Turbo |
Power (difference from average) |
147 hp / 108 kw
(-15%) |
Power to torque ratio | 37 % |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 37 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 73.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.1 TD |
Power (difference from average) |
109 hp / 80 kw
(-37%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 51.9 points |