In Ritmo Fiat Ritmo horsepower was between 68 and 105 hp or 50 and 77 kW.
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
50 1.3 |
68 hp / 50 kw
(-61%) |
- | - | - | |
85 1.5 |
86 hp / 63 kw
(-50%) |
- | - | - | |
100 1.6 |
105 hp / 77 kw
(-39%) |
- | - | - |
Vehicle | 50 1.3 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
68 hp / 50 kw
(-61%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 85 1.5 |
Power (difference from average) |
86 hp / 63 kw
(-50%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 100 1.6 |
Power (difference from average) |
105 hp / 77 kw
(-39%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
In Ritmo Fiat Ritmo horsepower was between 58 and 130 hp or 43 and 96 kW.
Fiat Ritmo horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
60 1.1 |
58 hp / 43 kw
(-66%) |
- | - | - | |
90 1.6 i.e. |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
- | - | - | |
130 TC Abarth 2.0 |
130 hp / 96 kw
(-25%) |
- | 33 hp / 24 kw | 65 points | |
60 Diesel 1.7 |
60 hp / 44 kw
(-65%) |
- | - | - | |
70 1.3 |
68 hp / 50 kw
(-61%) |
- | - | - | |
75 1.5 |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
- | - | - | |
75 1.5 CAT |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
- | - | - | |
85 1.5 |
82 hp / 60 kw
(-53%) |
- | - | - | |
80 Turbo Diesel 1.9 |
80 hp / 59 kw
(-54%) |
- | - | - | |
105 1.6 |
105 hp / 77 kw
(-39%) |
- | - | - | |
100 1.6 |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
- | - | - |
Vehicle | 60 1.1 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
58 hp / 43 kw
(-66%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 90 1.6 i.e. |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 130 TC Abarth 2.0 |
Power (difference from average) |
130 hp / 96 kw
(-25%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 65 points |
Vehicle | 60 Diesel 1.7 |
Power (difference from average) |
60 hp / 44 kw
(-65%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 70 1.3 |
Power (difference from average) |
68 hp / 50 kw
(-61%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 75 1.5 |
Power (difference from average) |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 75 1.5 CAT |
Power (difference from average) |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 85 1.5 |
Power (difference from average) |
82 hp / 60 kw
(-53%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 80 Turbo Diesel 1.9 |
Power (difference from average) |
80 hp / 59 kw
(-54%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 105 1.6 |
Power (difference from average) |
105 hp / 77 kw
(-39%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 100 1.6 |
Power (difference from average) |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
In Ritmo Fiat Ritmo horsepower was between 55 and 125 hp or 40 and 92 kW.
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
90 i.e. 1.6 |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
- | - | - | |
85 1.5 |
85 hp / 63 kw
(-51%) |
- | - | - | |
75 i.e. 1.5 |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
- | - | - | |
55 Diesel 1.7 |
55 hp / 40 kw
(-68%) |
- | - | - | |
75 1.3 |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
- | - | - | |
65 1.3 |
65 hp / 48 kw
(-62%) |
- | - | - | |
60 1.0 |
60 hp / 44 kw
(-65%) |
- | - | - | |
70 1.3 |
65 hp / 48 kw
(-62%) |
- | - | - | |
125 TC Abarth 2.0 |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
- | - | - | |
105 Sport 1.6 |
105 hp / 77 kw
(-39%) |
- | - | - |
Vehicle | 90 i.e. 1.6 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 85 1.5 |
Power (difference from average) |
85 hp / 63 kw
(-51%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 75 i.e. 1.5 |
Power (difference from average) |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 55 Diesel 1.7 |
Power (difference from average) |
55 hp / 40 kw
(-68%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 75 1.3 |
Power (difference from average) |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 65 1.3 |
Power (difference from average) |
65 hp / 48 kw
(-62%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 60 1.0 |
Power (difference from average) |
60 hp / 44 kw
(-65%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 70 1.3 |
Power (difference from average) |
65 hp / 48 kw
(-62%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 125 TC Abarth 2.0 |
Power (difference from average) |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 105 Sport 1.6 |
Power (difference from average) |
105 hp / 77 kw
(-39%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |