In 2006 Fiat Croma horsepower was between 120 and 200 hp or 88 and 147 kW.
Fiat Croma horsepower to weight ratio in 2006 is shown in the chart.
Fiat Croma horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.9 16V Multijet |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+53% | 30 hp / 22 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 78.9 points |
2.2i 16V |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+26% | 30 hp / 22 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 68.2 points |
2.4 Multijet |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
+50% | 40 hp / 29 kw | 40 hp / 29 kw | 83.3 points |
1.9 Multijet |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
+57% | 24 hp / 18 kw | 30 hp / 22 kw | 63.2 points |
1.8 16V |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
+20% | 28 hp / 21 kw | 35 hp / 26 kw | 77.8 points |
Vehicle | 1.9 16V Multijet |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 53 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 78.9 points |
Vehicle | 2.2i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68.2 points |
Vehicle | 2.4 Multijet |
Power (difference from average) |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 50 % |
Power per passenger | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 83.3 points |
Vehicle | 1.9 Multijet |
Power (difference from average) |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 63.2 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
Power to torque ratio | 20 % |
Power per passenger | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 77.8 points |
In 1986 Fiat Croma horsepower was between 75 and 162 hp or 55 and 119 kW.
Fiat Croma horsepower to weight ratio in 1986 is shown in the chart.
Fiat Croma horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2000 CHT |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
+42% | 20 hp / 15 kw | 25 hp / 19 kw | 50 points |
2500 V6 |
162 hp / 119 kw
(-6%) |
+24% | 32 hp / 24 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 64.8 points |
2500 TD |
101 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
- | - | - | |
2500 TDE |
105 hp / 77 kw
(-39%) |
+53% | 21 hp / 15 kw | 26 hp / 19 kw | 42 points |
2500 D |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
- | - | - | |
2000 i.e. Turbo |
151 hp / 111 kw
(-13%) |
- | - | - | |
2000 i.e. |
116 hp / 85 kw
(-33%) |
+28% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 58 points |
2000 16V |
137 hp / 101 kw
(-21%) |
+24% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 68.5 points |
1900 Turbo D i.d. |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
- | - | - | |
1600 |
83 hp / 61 kw
(-52%) |
- | - | - |
Vehicle | 2000 CHT |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
Power to torque ratio | 42 % |
Power per passenger | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 25 hp / 19 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 50 points |
Vehicle | 2500 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
162 hp / 119 kw
(-6%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 32 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 64.8 points |
Vehicle | 2500 TD |
Power (difference from average) |
101 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2500 TDE |
Power (difference from average) |
105 hp / 77 kw
(-39%) |
Power to torque ratio | 53 % |
Power per passenger | 21 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 42 points |
Vehicle | 2500 D |
Power (difference from average) |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2000 i.e. Turbo |
Power (difference from average) |
151 hp / 111 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2000 i.e. |
Power (difference from average) |
116 hp / 85 kw
(-33%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 58 points |
Vehicle | 2000 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
137 hp / 101 kw
(-21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68.5 points |
Vehicle | 1900 Turbo D i.d. |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1600 |
Power (difference from average) |
83 hp / 61 kw
(-52%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |