In 1995 Citroen XM horsepower was between 109 and 200 hp or 80 and 147 kW.
Citroen XM horsepower to weight ratio in 1995 is shown in the chart.
Citroen XM horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.1 TD 12V |
109 hp / 80 kw
(-37%) |
+56% | 22 hp / 16 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 51.9 points |
2.0 i 16V |
132 hp / 97 kw
(-24%) |
+27% | 26 hp / 19 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 66 points |
3.0 V6 |
167 hp / 123 kw
(-3%) |
+29% | 33 hp / 25 kw | 28 hp / 21 kw | 55.7 points |
3.0 V6 24V |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
+23% | 40 hp / 29 kw | 33 hp / 25 kw | 66.7 points |
2.0 Turbo |
147 hp / 108 kw
(-15%) |
+37% | 29 hp / 22 kw | 37 hp / 27 kw | 73.5 points |
2.5 TD |
129 hp / 95 kw
(-25%) |
+55% | 26 hp / 19 kw | 32 hp / 24 kw | 53.8 points |
Vehicle | 2.1 TD 12V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
109 hp / 80 kw
(-37%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 51.9 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
132 hp / 97 kw
(-24%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 66 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
167 hp / 123 kw
(-3%) |
Power to torque ratio | 29 % |
Power per passenger | 33 hp / 25 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 55.7 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 24V |
Power (difference from average) |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 23 % |
Power per passenger | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 66.7 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 Turbo |
Power (difference from average) |
147 hp / 108 kw
(-15%) |
Power to torque ratio | 37 % |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 37 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 73.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 TD |
Power (difference from average) |
129 hp / 95 kw
(-25%) |
Power to torque ratio | 55 % |
Power per passenger | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 32 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 53.8 points |
In 1995 Citroen XM horsepower was between 109 and 167 hp or 80 and 123 kW.
Citroen XM horsepower to weight ratio in 1995 is shown in the chart.
Citroen XM horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.1 TD 12V |
109 hp / 80 kw
(-37%) |
+56% | 22 hp / 16 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 51.9 points |
3.0 V6 |
167 hp / 123 kw
(-3%) |
+29% | 33 hp / 25 kw | 28 hp / 21 kw | 55.7 points |
2.0 i 16V |
132 hp / 97 kw
(-24%) |
+27% | 26 hp / 19 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 66 points |
2.5 TD |
129 hp / 95 kw
(-25%) |
+55% | 26 hp / 19 kw | 32 hp / 24 kw | 53.8 points |
2.0 Turbo |
147 hp / 108 kw
(-15%) |
+37% | 29 hp / 22 kw | 37 hp / 27 kw | 73.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.1 TD 12V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
109 hp / 80 kw
(-37%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 51.9 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
167 hp / 123 kw
(-3%) |
Power to torque ratio | 29 % |
Power per passenger | 33 hp / 25 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 55.7 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
132 hp / 97 kw
(-24%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 66 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 TD |
Power (difference from average) |
129 hp / 95 kw
(-25%) |
Power to torque ratio | 55 % |
Power per passenger | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 32 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 53.8 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 Turbo |
Power (difference from average) |
147 hp / 108 kw
(-15%) |
Power to torque ratio | 37 % |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 37 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 73.5 points |
In 1990 Citroen XM horsepower was between 82 and 200 hp or 60 and 147 kW.
Citroen XM horsepower to weight ratio in 1990 is shown in the chart.
Citroen XM horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.1 TD 12V |
110 hp / 81 kw
(-36%) |
+55% | 22 hp / 16 kw | 28 hp / 20 kw | 52.4 points |
2.0 i |
121 hp / 89 kw
(-30%) |
+30% | 24 hp / 18 kw | 30 hp / 22 kw | 60.5 points |
2.0 i TCT |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
+36% | 29 hp / 21 kw | 36 hp / 27 kw | 72.5 points |
3.0 i V6 24V |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
+23% | 40 hp / 29 kw | 33 hp / 25 kw | 66.7 points |
3.0 i V6 |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
+29% | 34 hp / 25 kw | 28 hp / 21 kw | 56.7 points |
2.1 D 12V |
82 hp / 60 kw
(-53%) |
+44% | 16 hp / 12 kw | 21 hp / 15 kw | 39 points |
Vehicle | 2.1 TD 12V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
110 hp / 81 kw
(-36%) |
Power to torque ratio | 55 % |
Power per passenger | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 52.4 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i |
Power (difference from average) |
121 hp / 89 kw
(-30%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 60.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i TCT |
Power (difference from average) |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 36 % |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 72.5 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 i V6 24V |
Power (difference from average) |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 23 % |
Power per passenger | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 66.7 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 i V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
Power to torque ratio | 29 % |
Power per passenger | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 56.7 points |
Vehicle | 2.1 D 12V |
Power (difference from average) |
82 hp / 60 kw
(-53%) |
Power to torque ratio | 44 % |
Power per passenger | 16 hp / 12 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 21 hp / 15 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 39 points |
In 1990 Citroen XM horsepower was between 82 and 170 hp or 60 and 125 kW.
Citroen XM horsepower to weight ratio in 1990 is shown in the chart.
Citroen XM horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.1 D 12V |
82 hp / 60 kw
(-53%) |
+44% | 16 hp / 12 kw | 21 hp / 15 kw | 39 points |
2.0 i Turbo CT |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
+36% | 29 hp / 21 kw | 36 hp / 27 kw | 72.5 points |
2.1 TD 12V |
109 hp / 80 kw
(-37%) |
+56% | 22 hp / 16 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 51.9 points |
2.0 i |
121 hp / 89 kw
(-30%) |
+30% | 24 hp / 18 kw | 30 hp / 22 kw | 60.5 points |
3.0 i V6 |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
+29% | 34 hp / 25 kw | 28 hp / 21 kw | 56.7 points |
Vehicle | 2.1 D 12V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
82 hp / 60 kw
(-53%) |
Power to torque ratio | 44 % |
Power per passenger | 16 hp / 12 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 21 hp / 15 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 39 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i Turbo CT |
Power (difference from average) |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 36 % |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 72.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.1 TD 12V |
Power (difference from average) |
109 hp / 80 kw
(-37%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 51.9 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i |
Power (difference from average) |
121 hp / 89 kw
(-30%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 60.5 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 i V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
Power to torque ratio | 29 % |
Power per passenger | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 56.7 points |