In 2008 Citroen C8 horsepower was between 120 and 170 hp or 88 and 125 kW.
Citroen C8 horsepower to weight ratio in 2008 is shown in the chart.
Citroen C8 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2 HDi Biturbo |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
+54% | 24 hp / 18 kw | 43 hp / 31 kw | 77.3 points |
2.0i 16V |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
+30% | 20 hp / 15 kw | 35 hp / 26 kw | 70 points |
2.0 HDi 16V |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
+60% | 17 hp / 13 kw | 30 hp / 22 kw | 60 points |
2.0 HDi |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
+49% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 41 hp / 30 kw | 81.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.2 HDi Biturbo |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
Power to torque ratio | 54 % |
Power per passenger | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 43 hp / 31 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 77.3 points |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 HDi 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
Power to torque ratio | 60 % |
Power per passenger | 17 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 60 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 HDi |
Power (difference from average) |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
Power to torque ratio | 49 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 81.5 points |
In 2003 Citroen C8 horsepower was between 128 and 204 hp or 94 and 150 kW.
Citroen C8 horsepower to weight ratio in 2003 is shown in the chart.
Citroen C8 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 HDi 16V |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
+58% | 19 hp / 14 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 68 points |
2.2i 16V |
158 hp / 116 kw
(-9%) |
+27% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 40 hp / 29 kw | 71.8 points |
3.0i V6 |
204 hp / 150 kw
(+18%) |
+28% | 29 hp / 21 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 70.3 points |
2.2 HDi 16V |
128 hp / 94 kw
(-26%) |
+59% | 18 hp / 13 kw | 32 hp / 24 kw | 58.2 points |
2.0i 16V |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
+28% | 19 hp / 14 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 68 points |
2.2 HDi Biturbo |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
+54% | 24 hp / 18 kw | 43 hp / 31 kw | 77.3 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 HDi 16V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 58 % |
Power per passenger | 19 hp / 14 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68 points |
Vehicle | 2.2i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
158 hp / 116 kw
(-9%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 71.8 points |
Vehicle | 3.0i V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
204 hp / 150 kw
(+18%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70.3 points |
Vehicle | 2.2 HDi 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
128 hp / 94 kw
(-26%) |
Power to torque ratio | 59 % |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 32 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 58.2 points |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 19 hp / 14 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68 points |
Vehicle | 2.2 HDi Biturbo |
Power (difference from average) |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
Power to torque ratio | 54 % |
Power per passenger | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 43 hp / 31 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 77.3 points |