In 2021 Chevrolet Suburban horsepower was between 277 and 420 hp or 204 and 309 kW.
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5.3 V8 |
355 hp / 261 kw
(+105%) |
+32% | 51 hp / 37 kw | 44 hp / 33 kw | - |
6.2 V8 |
420 hp / 309 kw
(+143%) |
+33% | 60 hp / 44 kw | 53 hp / 39 kw | - |
3.0d |
277 hp / 204 kw
(+60%) |
+56% | 40 hp / 29 kw | 46 hp / 34 kw | - |
Vehicle | 5.3 V8 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
355 hp / 261 kw
(+105%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 51 hp / 37 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 44 hp / 33 kw |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 6.2 V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
420 hp / 309 kw
(+143%) |
Power to torque ratio | 33 % |
Power per passenger | 60 hp / 44 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 53 hp / 39 kw |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 3.0d |
Power (difference from average) |
277 hp / 204 kw
(+60%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 46 hp / 34 kw |
Power to consumption rate | - |
In 2015 Chevrolet Suburban horsepower was between 355 and 420 hp or 261 and 309 kW.
Chevrolet Suburban horsepower to weight ratio in 2015 is shown in the chart.
Chevrolet Suburban horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6.2 EcoTec V8 |
420 hp / 309 kw
(+143%) |
+33% | 53 hp / 39 kw | 53 hp / 39 kw | 67.7 points |
5.3 EcoTec V8 |
355 hp / 261 kw
(+105%) |
+32% | 39 hp / 29 kw | 44 hp / 33 kw | 67 points |
Vehicle | 6.2 EcoTec V8 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
420 hp / 309 kw
(+143%) |
Power to torque ratio | 33 % |
Power per passenger | 53 hp / 39 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 53 hp / 39 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 67.7 points |
Vehicle | 5.3 EcoTec V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
355 hp / 261 kw
(+105%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 39 hp / 29 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 44 hp / 33 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 67 points |
In 2007 Chevrolet Suburban horsepower was between 320 and 359 hp or 235 and 264 kW.
Chevrolet Suburban horsepower to weight ratio in 2007 is shown in the chart.
Chevrolet Suburban horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6.0 i V8 16V AWD |
359 hp / 264 kw
(+108%) |
+27% | 40 hp / 29 kw | 45 hp / 33 kw | 59.8 points |
5.3 i V8 |
320 hp / 235 kw
(+85%) |
+30% | 36 hp / 26 kw | 40 hp / 29 kw | 60.4 points |
6.0 i V8 |
352 hp / 259 kw
(+103%) |
+32% | 39 hp / 29 kw | 44 hp / 32 kw | 58.7 points |
6.0 i V8 16V |
359 hp / 264 kw
(+108%) |
+27% | 40 hp / 29 kw | 45 hp / 33 kw | 59.8 points |
Vehicle | 6.0 i V8 16V AWD |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
359 hp / 264 kw
(+108%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 45 hp / 33 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 59.8 points |
Vehicle | 5.3 i V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
320 hp / 235 kw
(+85%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 60.4 points |
Vehicle | 6.0 i V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
352 hp / 259 kw
(+103%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 39 hp / 29 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 44 hp / 32 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 58.7 points |
Vehicle | 6.0 i V8 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
359 hp / 264 kw
(+108%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 45 hp / 33 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 59.8 points |
In 2000 Chevrolet Suburban horsepower was between 288 and 344 hp or 212 and 253 kW.
Chevrolet Suburban horsepower to weight ratio in 2000 is shown in the chart.
Chevrolet Suburban horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5.3 i V8 4WD |
300 hp / 221 kw
(+73%) |
+33% | 33 hp / 25 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 56.6 points |
5.3 i V8 |
300 hp / 221 kw
(+73%) |
+33% | 33 hp / 25 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 56.6 points |
5.3 i V8 1500 |
288 hp / 212 kw
(+66%) |
+35% | 32 hp / 24 kw | 36 hp / 27 kw | 54.3 points |
5.3 i V8 4WD 1500 |
288 hp / 212 kw
(+66%) |
+35% | 32 hp / 24 kw | 36 hp / 27 kw | 54.3 points |
6.0 i V8 2500 |
340 hp / 250 kw
(+97%) |
+33% | 38 hp / 28 kw | 43 hp / 31 kw | 56.7 points |
6.0 i V8 4WD 2500 |
304 hp / 224 kw
(+76%) |
+37% | 34 hp / 25 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 50.7 points |
8.1 i V8 |
329 hp / 242 kw
(+90%) |
+46% | 37 hp / 27 kw | 41 hp / 30 kw | 40.6 points |
8.1 i V8 4WD |
329 hp / 242 kw
(+90%) |
+46% | 37 hp / 27 kw | 41 hp / 30 kw | 40.6 points |
8.1 i V8 2500 |
344 hp / 253 kw
(+99%) |
+44% | 38 hp / 28 kw | 43 hp / 32 kw | 42.5 points |
8.1 i V8 4WD 2500 |
344 hp / 253 kw
(+99%) |
+44% | 38 hp / 28 kw | 43 hp / 32 kw | 42.5 points |
Vehicle | 5.3 i V8 4WD |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
300 hp / 221 kw
(+73%) |
Power to torque ratio | 33 % |
Power per passenger | 33 hp / 25 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 56.6 points |
Vehicle | 5.3 i V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
300 hp / 221 kw
(+73%) |
Power to torque ratio | 33 % |
Power per passenger | 33 hp / 25 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 56.6 points |
Vehicle | 5.3 i V8 1500 |
Power (difference from average) |
288 hp / 212 kw
(+66%) |
Power to torque ratio | 35 % |
Power per passenger | 32 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 54.3 points |
Vehicle | 5.3 i V8 4WD 1500 |
Power (difference from average) |
288 hp / 212 kw
(+66%) |
Power to torque ratio | 35 % |
Power per passenger | 32 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 54.3 points |
Vehicle | 6.0 i V8 2500 |
Power (difference from average) |
340 hp / 250 kw
(+97%) |
Power to torque ratio | 33 % |
Power per passenger | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 43 hp / 31 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 56.7 points |
Vehicle | 6.0 i V8 4WD 2500 |
Power (difference from average) |
304 hp / 224 kw
(+76%) |
Power to torque ratio | 37 % |
Power per passenger | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 50.7 points |
Vehicle | 8.1 i V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
329 hp / 242 kw
(+90%) |
Power to torque ratio | 46 % |
Power per passenger | 37 hp / 27 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 40.6 points |
Vehicle | 8.1 i V8 4WD |
Power (difference from average) |
329 hp / 242 kw
(+90%) |
Power to torque ratio | 46 % |
Power per passenger | 37 hp / 27 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 40.6 points |
Vehicle | 8.1 i V8 2500 |
Power (difference from average) |
344 hp / 253 kw
(+99%) |
Power to torque ratio | 44 % |
Power per passenger | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 43 hp / 32 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 42.5 points |
Vehicle | 8.1 i V8 4WD 2500 |
Power (difference from average) |
344 hp / 253 kw
(+99%) |
Power to torque ratio | 44 % |
Power per passenger | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 43 hp / 32 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 42.5 points |
In 1992 Chevrolet Suburban horsepower was between 173 and 290 hp or 127 and 213 kW.
Chevrolet Suburban horsepower to weight ratio in 1992 is shown in the chart.
Chevrolet Suburban horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5.7 i V8 |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
+52% | 22 hp / 16 kw | 25 hp / 18 kw | 35.1 points |
5.7 i V8 4WD |
210 hp / 154 kw
(+21%) |
+48% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 26 hp / 19 kw | 36.8 points |
6.5 i V8 TD |
173 hp / 127 kw
(0%) |
+67% | 19 hp / 14 kw | 22 hp / 16 kw | 26.6 points |
6.5 i V8 TD 4WD |
180 hp / 132 kw
(+4%) |
+51% | 20 hp / 15 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 27.7 points |
7.4 i V8 4WD |
290 hp / 213 kw
(+68%) |
+48% | 32 hp / 24 kw | 36 hp / 27 kw | 39.2 points |
7.4 i V8 |
230 hp / 169 kw
(+33%) |
+56% | 26 hp / 19 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 31.1 points |
Vehicle | 5.7 i V8 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 52 % |
Power per passenger | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 35.1 points |
Vehicle | 5.7 i V8 4WD |
Power (difference from average) |
210 hp / 154 kw
(+21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 48 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 36.8 points |
Vehicle | 6.5 i V8 TD |
Power (difference from average) |
173 hp / 127 kw
(0%) |
Power to torque ratio | 67 % |
Power per passenger | 19 hp / 14 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 26.6 points |
Vehicle | 6.5 i V8 TD 4WD |
Power (difference from average) |
180 hp / 132 kw
(+4%) |
Power to torque ratio | 51 % |
Power per passenger | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 27.7 points |
Vehicle | 7.4 i V8 4WD |
Power (difference from average) |
290 hp / 213 kw
(+68%) |
Power to torque ratio | 48 % |
Power per passenger | 32 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 39.2 points |
Vehicle | 7.4 i V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
230 hp / 169 kw
(+33%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 31.1 points |
In 1973 Chevrolet Suburban horsepower was 160 hp or 118 kW
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5.7L V8 |
160 hp / 118 kw
(-8%) |
- | - | - |
Vehicle | 5.7L V8 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
160 hp / 118 kw
(-8%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |