In 1999 Chevrolet Astra horsepower was between 110 and 136 hp or 81 and 100 kW.
Chevrolet Astra horsepower to weight ratio in 1999 is shown in the chart.
Chevrolet Astra horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 i |
110 hp / 81 kw
(-36%) |
+29% | 22 hp / 16 kw | 28 hp / 20 kw | 61.1 points |
2.0 i 16V |
128 hp / 94 kw
(-26%) |
+32% | 26 hp / 19 kw | 32 hp / 24 kw | 64 points |
2.0 i 16V |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
+28% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 68 points |
2.0 i |
111 hp / 82 kw
(-36%) |
+35% | 22 hp / 16 kw | 28 hp / 21 kw | 55.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 i |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
110 hp / 81 kw
(-36%) |
Power to torque ratio | 29 % |
Power per passenger | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 61.1 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
128 hp / 94 kw
(-26%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 32 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 64 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i |
Power (difference from average) |
111 hp / 82 kw
(-36%) |
Power to torque ratio | 35 % |
Power per passenger | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 55.5 points |
In 1998 Chevrolet Astra horsepower was between 101 and 136 hp or 74 and 100 kW.
Chevrolet Astra horsepower to weight ratio in 1998 is shown in the chart.
Chevrolet Astra horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 i |
110 hp / 81 kw
(-36%) |
+29% | 22 hp / 16 kw | 28 hp / 20 kw | 61.1 points |
2.0 i |
111 hp / 82 kw
(-36%) |
+35% | 22 hp / 16 kw | 28 hp / 21 kw | 55.5 points |
2.0 i 16V Sport |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
+28% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 68 points |
2.0 TDi |
101 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
+56% | 20 hp / 15 kw | 25 hp / 19 kw | 50.5 points |
2.0 i 16V |
128 hp / 94 kw
(-26%) |
+32% | 26 hp / 19 kw | 32 hp / 24 kw | 64 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 i |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
110 hp / 81 kw
(-36%) |
Power to torque ratio | 29 % |
Power per passenger | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 61.1 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i |
Power (difference from average) |
111 hp / 82 kw
(-36%) |
Power to torque ratio | 35 % |
Power per passenger | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 55.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V Sport |
Power (difference from average) |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDi |
Power (difference from average) |
101 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 25 hp / 19 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 50.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
128 hp / 94 kw
(-26%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 32 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 64 points |