In SRX Cadillac SRX horsepower was 308 hp or 227 kW
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.6 V6 |
308 hp / 227 kw
(+78%) |
+14% | 62 hp / 45 kw | 51 hp / 38 kw | - |
Vehicle | 3.6 V6 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
308 hp / 227 kw
(+78%) |
Power to torque ratio | 14 % |
Power per passenger | 62 hp / 45 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 51 hp / 38 kw |
Power to consumption rate | - |
In SRX Cadillac SRX horsepower was between 265 and 308 hp or 195 and 227 kW.
Cadillac SRX horsepower to weight ratio in SRX is shown in the chart.
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.6 V6 |
308 hp / 227 kw
(+78%) |
+14% | 62 hp / 45 kw | 51 hp / 38 kw | - |
3.0 V6 |
265 hp / 195 kw
(+53%) |
+12% | 53 hp / 39 kw | 44 hp / 33 kw | - |
2.8T V6 |
300 hp / 221 kw
(+73%) |
+25% | 60 hp / 44 kw | 50 hp / 37 kw | - |
Vehicle | 3.6 V6 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
308 hp / 227 kw
(+78%) |
Power to torque ratio | 14 % |
Power per passenger | 62 hp / 45 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 51 hp / 38 kw |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
265 hp / 195 kw
(+53%) |
Power to torque ratio | 12 % |
Power per passenger | 53 hp / 39 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 44 hp / 33 kw |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.8T V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
300 hp / 221 kw
(+73%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 60 hp / 44 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 50 hp / 37 kw |
Power to consumption rate | - |
In 2004 Cadillac SRX horsepower was between 255 and 324 hp or 188 and 238 kW.
Cadillac SRX horsepower to weight ratio in 2004 is shown in the chart.
Cadillac SRX horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.6 i V6 24V AWD |
255 hp / 188 kw
(+47%) |
+26% | 36 hp / 27 kw | 43 hp / 31 kw | 70.8 points |
3.6 i V6 24V RWD |
255 hp / 188 kw
(+47%) |
+26% | 36 hp / 27 kw | 43 hp / 31 kw | 70.8 points |
4.6 i V8 32V RWD |
324 hp / 238 kw
(+87%) |
+23% | 46 hp / 34 kw | 41 hp / 30 kw | 70.4 points |
4.6 i V8 32V AWD |
324 hp / 238 kw
(+87%) |
+23% | 46 hp / 34 kw | 41 hp / 30 kw | 70.4 points |
Vehicle | 3.6 i V6 24V AWD |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
255 hp / 188 kw
(+47%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 43 hp / 31 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70.8 points |
Vehicle | 3.6 i V6 24V RWD |
Power (difference from average) |
255 hp / 188 kw
(+47%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 43 hp / 31 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70.8 points |
Vehicle | 4.6 i V8 32V RWD |
Power (difference from average) |
324 hp / 238 kw
(+87%) |
Power to torque ratio | 23 % |
Power per passenger | 46 hp / 34 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70.4 points |
Vehicle | 4.6 i V8 32V AWD |
Power (difference from average) |
324 hp / 238 kw
(+87%) |
Power to torque ratio | 23 % |
Power per passenger | 46 hp / 34 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70.4 points |