In 2014 Cadillac CTS horsepower was between 272 and 649 hp or 200 and 477 kW.
Cadillac CTS horsepower to weight ratio in 2014 is shown in the chart.
Cadillac CTS horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
272 hp / 200 kw
(+57%) |
+32% | 54 hp / 40 kw | 68 hp / 50 kw | 136 points |
3.6 V6 |
426 hp / 313 kw
(+146%) |
+27% | 85 hp / 63 kw | 71 hp / 52 kw | 118.3 points |
V 6.2 V8 |
649 hp / 477 kw
(+275%) |
+24% | 130 hp / 95 kw | 81 hp / 60 kw | 104.7 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
272 hp / 200 kw
(+57%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 54 hp / 40 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 68 hp / 50 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 136 points |
Vehicle | 3.6 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
426 hp / 313 kw
(+146%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 85 hp / 63 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 71 hp / 52 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 118.3 points |
Vehicle | V 6.2 V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
649 hp / 477 kw
(+275%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 130 hp / 95 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 81 hp / 60 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 104.7 points |
In 2011 Cadillac CTS horsepower was between 304 and 564 hp or 224 and 415 kW.
Cadillac CTS horsepower to weight ratio in 2011 is shown in the chart.
Cadillac CTS horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
V 6.2 V8 |
564 hp / 415 kw
(+226%) |
+24% | 282 hp / 208 kw | 71 hp / 52 kw | 91 points |
3.6 V6 |
322 hp / 237 kw
(+86%) |
+14% | 81 hp / 59 kw | 54 hp / 40 kw | 89.4 points |
3.6 V6 VVT |
304 hp / 224 kw
(+76%) |
+18% | 152 hp / 112 kw | 51 hp / 37 kw | 84.4 points |
Vehicle | V 6.2 V8 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
564 hp / 415 kw
(+226%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 282 hp / 208 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 71 hp / 52 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 91 points |
Vehicle | 3.6 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
322 hp / 237 kw
(+86%) |
Power to torque ratio | 14 % |
Power per passenger | 81 hp / 59 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 54 hp / 40 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 89.4 points |
Vehicle | 3.6 V6 VVT |
Power (difference from average) |
304 hp / 224 kw
(+76%) |
Power to torque ratio | 18 % |
Power per passenger | 152 hp / 112 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 51 hp / 37 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 84.4 points |
In 2010 Cadillac CTS horsepower was between 273 and 564 hp or 201 and 415 kW.
Cadillac CTS horsepower to weight ratio in 2010 is shown in the chart.
Cadillac CTS horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.6 V6 |
322 hp / 237 kw
(+86%) |
+14% | 64 hp / 47 kw | 54 hp / 40 kw | 89.4 points |
3.0 V6 |
273 hp / 201 kw
(+58%) |
+10% | 55 hp / 40 kw | 46 hp / 34 kw | 91 points |
V 6.2 V8 |
564 hp / 415 kw
(+226%) |
+24% | 113 hp / 83 kw | 71 hp / 52 kw | 91 points |
Vehicle | 3.6 V6 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
322 hp / 237 kw
(+86%) |
Power to torque ratio | 14 % |
Power per passenger | 64 hp / 47 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 54 hp / 40 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 89.4 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
273 hp / 201 kw
(+58%) |
Power to torque ratio | 10 % |
Power per passenger | 55 hp / 40 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 46 hp / 34 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 91 points |
Vehicle | V 6.2 V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
564 hp / 415 kw
(+226%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 113 hp / 83 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 71 hp / 52 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 91 points |
In 2008 Cadillac CTS horsepower was between 211 and 564 hp or 155 and 415 kW.
Cadillac CTS horsepower to weight ratio in 2008 is shown in the chart.
Cadillac CTS horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.6L V6 SIDI |
311 hp / 229 kw
(+80%) |
+17% | 62 hp / 46 kw | 52 hp / 38 kw | 86.4 points |
3.0 V6 |
273 hp / 201 kw
(+58%) |
+10% | 55 hp / 40 kw | 46 hp / 34 kw | 91 points |
V 6.2 V8 |
564 hp / 415 kw
(+226%) |
+24% | 113 hp / 83 kw | 71 hp / 52 kw | 91 points |
2.8L V6 SFI |
211 hp / 155 kw
(+22%) |
+14% | 42 hp / 31 kw | 35 hp / 26 kw | 75.4 points |
Vehicle | 3.6L V6 SIDI |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
311 hp / 229 kw
(+80%) |
Power to torque ratio | 17 % |
Power per passenger | 62 hp / 46 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 52 hp / 38 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 86.4 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
273 hp / 201 kw
(+58%) |
Power to torque ratio | 10 % |
Power per passenger | 55 hp / 40 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 46 hp / 34 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 91 points |
Vehicle | V 6.2 V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
564 hp / 415 kw
(+226%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 113 hp / 83 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 71 hp / 52 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 91 points |
Vehicle | 2.8L V6 SFI |
Power (difference from average) |
211 hp / 155 kw
(+22%) |
Power to torque ratio | 14 % |
Power per passenger | 42 hp / 31 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75.4 points |
In 2003 Cadillac CTS horsepower was between 181 and 405 hp or 133 and 298 kW.
Cadillac CTS horsepower to weight ratio in 2003 is shown in the chart.
Cadillac CTS horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
V 6.0 i V8 |
405 hp / 298 kw
(+134%) |
+24% | 101 hp / 75 kw | 51 hp / 37 kw | 67.5 points |
2.6i V6 24V L |
181 hp / 133 kw
(+5%) |
+26% | 36 hp / 27 kw | 30 hp / 22 kw | 69.6 points |
3.2i V6 24V |
223 hp / 164 kw
(+29%) |
+25% | 45 hp / 33 kw | 37 hp / 27 kw | 69.7 points |
2.8i V6 24V |
215 hp / 158 kw
(+24%) |
+18% | 43 hp / 32 kw | 36 hp / 26 kw | 76.8 points |
3.6i V6 24V |
258 hp / 190 kw
(+49%) |
+25% | 52 hp / 38 kw | 43 hp / 32 kw | 71.7 points |
V 5.7 i V8 |
405 hp / 298 kw
(+134%) |
+24% | 81 hp / 60 kw | 51 hp / 37 kw | 71.1 points |
Vehicle | V 6.0 i V8 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
405 hp / 298 kw
(+134%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 101 hp / 75 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 51 hp / 37 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 67.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.6i V6 24V L |
Power (difference from average) |
181 hp / 133 kw
(+5%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 69.6 points |
Vehicle | 3.2i V6 24V |
Power (difference from average) |
223 hp / 164 kw
(+29%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 45 hp / 33 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 37 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 69.7 points |
Vehicle | 2.8i V6 24V |
Power (difference from average) |
215 hp / 158 kw
(+24%) |
Power to torque ratio | 18 % |
Power per passenger | 43 hp / 32 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 76.8 points |
Vehicle | 3.6i V6 24V |
Power (difference from average) |
258 hp / 190 kw
(+49%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 52 hp / 38 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 43 hp / 32 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 71.7 points |
Vehicle | V 5.7 i V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
405 hp / 298 kw
(+134%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 81 hp / 60 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 51 hp / 37 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 71.1 points |