In 2015 Cadillac ATS horsepower was between 276 and 471 hp or 203 and 346 kW.
Cadillac ATS horsepower to weight ratio in 2015 is shown in the chart.
Cadillac ATS horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
276 hp / 203 kw
(+60%) |
+31% | 69 hp / 51 kw | 69 hp / 51 kw | 138 points |
V 3.6 V6 |
471 hp / 346 kw
(+172%) |
+22% | 118 hp / 87 kw | 79 hp / 58 kw | 130.8 points |
3.6 V6 |
325 hp / 239 kw
(+88%) |
+13% | 81 hp / 60 kw | 54 hp / 40 kw | 90.3 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
276 hp / 203 kw
(+60%) |
Power to torque ratio | 31 % |
Power per passenger | 69 hp / 51 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 69 hp / 51 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 138 points |
Vehicle | V 3.6 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
471 hp / 346 kw
(+172%) |
Power to torque ratio | 22 % |
Power per passenger | 118 hp / 87 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 79 hp / 58 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 130.8 points |
Vehicle | 3.6 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
325 hp / 239 kw
(+88%) |
Power to torque ratio | 13 % |
Power per passenger | 81 hp / 60 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 54 hp / 40 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 90.3 points |
In 2013 Cadillac ATS horsepower was between 205 and 461 hp or 151 and 339 kW.
Cadillac ATS horsepower to weight ratio in 2013 is shown in the chart.
Cadillac ATS horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
276 hp / 203 kw
(+60%) |
+22% | 55 hp / 41 kw | 69 hp / 51 kw | 138 points |
3.6 V6 |
325 hp / 239 kw
(+88%) |
+13% | 65 hp / 48 kw | 54 hp / 40 kw | 90.3 points |
V 3.6 V6 |
461 hp / 339 kw
(+166%) |
+24% | 92 hp / 68 kw | 77 hp / 57 kw | 128.1 points |
2.5 |
205 hp / 151 kw
(+18%) |
+21% | 41 hp / 30 kw | 51 hp / 38 kw | 82 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
276 hp / 203 kw
(+60%) |
Power to torque ratio | 22 % |
Power per passenger | 55 hp / 41 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 69 hp / 51 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 138 points |
Vehicle | 3.6 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
325 hp / 239 kw
(+88%) |
Power to torque ratio | 13 % |
Power per passenger | 65 hp / 48 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 54 hp / 40 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 90.3 points |
Vehicle | V 3.6 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
461 hp / 339 kw
(+166%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 92 hp / 68 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 77 hp / 57 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 128.1 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 |
Power (difference from average) |
205 hp / 151 kw
(+18%) |
Power to torque ratio | 21 % |
Power per passenger | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 51 hp / 38 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 82 points |