1990 100 Avant (4A,C4)
1990 100 (4A,C4)
1988 100 Avant (C3, Typ 44, 44Q, facelift 1988)
1988 100 (C3, Typ 44,44Q, facelift 1988)
1982 100 Avant (C3, Typ 44, 44Q)
1982 100 (C3, Typ 44,44Q)
1979 100 Avant (C2, Typ 43, facelift 1979)
1979 100 (C2, Typ 43, facelift 1979)
1977 100 Avant (C2, Typ 43)
1976 100 (C2, Typ 43)
1974 100 (C1, facelift 1973)
1970 100 Coupe S
1968 100 (C1)
In 1990 Audi 100 horsepower was between 82 and 230 hp or 60 and 169 kW.
Audi 100 horsepower to weight ratio in 1990 is shown in the chart.
Audi 100 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
101 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
+36% | 20 hp / 15 kw | 25 hp / 19 kw | 50.5 points |
2.5 TDI |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+57% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 46 points |
2.8 E |
174 hp / 128 kw
(+1%) |
+30% | 35 hp / 26 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 62.1 points |
2.2 S4 Turbo |
230 hp / 169 kw
(+33%) |
+34% | 46 hp / 34 kw | 46 hp / 34 kw | 104.5 points |
2.6 V6 |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+33% | 30 hp / 22 kw | 25 hp / 18 kw | 57.7 points |
2.0 E |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+32% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 57.5 points |
2.3 E |
133 hp / 98 kw
(-23%) |
+28% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 57.8 points |
2.0 16V |
137 hp / 101 kw
(-21%) |
+18% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 68.5 points |
2.8 V6 E |
174 hp / 128 kw
(+1%) |
+30% | 35 hp / 26 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 62.1 points |
2.4 D |
82 hp / 60 kw
(-53%) |
+50% | 16 hp / 12 kw | 16 hp / 12 kw | 34.2 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
101 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
Power to torque ratio | 36 % |
Power per passenger | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 25 hp / 19 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 50.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 TDI |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 46 points |
Vehicle | 2.8 E |
Power (difference from average) |
174 hp / 128 kw
(+1%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 62.1 points |
Vehicle | 2.2 S4 Turbo |
Power (difference from average) |
230 hp / 169 kw
(+33%) |
Power to torque ratio | 34 % |
Power per passenger | 46 hp / 34 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 46 hp / 34 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 104.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.6 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 33 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 57.7 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 E |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 57.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.3 E |
Power (difference from average) |
133 hp / 98 kw
(-23%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 57.8 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
137 hp / 101 kw
(-21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 18 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.8 V6 E |
Power (difference from average) |
174 hp / 128 kw
(+1%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 62.1 points |
Vehicle | 2.4 D |
Power (difference from average) |
82 hp / 60 kw
(-53%) |
Power to torque ratio | 50 % |
Power per passenger | 16 hp / 12 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 16 hp / 12 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 34.2 points |
In 1990 Audi 100 horsepower was between 82 and 174 hp or 60 and 128 kW.
Audi 100 horsepower to weight ratio in 1990 is shown in the chart.
Audi 100 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.8 V6 E |
174 hp / 128 kw
(+1%) |
+30% | 35 hp / 26 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 62.1 points |
2.3 E |
133 hp / 98 kw
(-23%) |
+28% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 57.8 points |
2.0 |
101 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
+36% | 20 hp / 15 kw | 25 hp / 19 kw | 50.5 points |
2.6 V6 |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+33% | 30 hp / 22 kw | 25 hp / 18 kw | 57.7 points |
2.4 D |
82 hp / 60 kw
(-53%) |
+50% | 16 hp / 12 kw | 16 hp / 12 kw | 34.2 points |
2.5 TDI |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+57% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 46 points |
2.0 E 16V |
137 hp / 101 kw
(-21%) |
+24% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 68.5 points |
2.0 E |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+32% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 57.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.8 V6 E |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
174 hp / 128 kw
(+1%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 62.1 points |
Vehicle | 2.3 E |
Power (difference from average) |
133 hp / 98 kw
(-23%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 57.8 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Power (difference from average) |
101 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
Power to torque ratio | 36 % |
Power per passenger | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 25 hp / 19 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 50.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.6 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 33 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 57.7 points |
Vehicle | 2.4 D |
Power (difference from average) |
82 hp / 60 kw
(-53%) |
Power to torque ratio | 50 % |
Power per passenger | 16 hp / 12 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 16 hp / 12 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 34.2 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 TDI |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 46 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 E 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
137 hp / 101 kw
(-21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 E |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 57.5 points |
In 1988 Audi 100 horsepower was between 70 and 165 hp or 51 and 121 kW.
Audi 100 horsepower to weight ratio in 1988 is shown in the chart.
Audi 100 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2 Turbo CAT |
165 hp / 121 kw
(-5%) |
+31% | 33 hp / 24 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 75 points |
2.3 |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
+28% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 59.1 points |
2.0 D |
70 hp / 51 kw
(-60%) |
+43% | 14 hp / 10 kw | 14 hp / 10 kw | 35 points |
1.8 |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
+38% | 18 hp / 13 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 50 points |
2.4 D |
82 hp / 60 kw
(-53%) |
+50% | 16 hp / 12 kw | 16 hp / 12 kw | 34.2 points |
1.8 CAT |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
+37% | 18 hp / 13 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 50 points |
2.0 E CAT |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+33% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 57.5 points |
2.0 TD |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
+48% | 20 hp / 15 kw | 20 hp / 15 kw | 50 points |
2.2 |
138 hp / 101 kw
(-20%) |
+27% | 28 hp / 20 kw | 28 hp / 20 kw | 62.7 points |
2.3 CAT |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
+28% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 59.1 points |
2.2 CAT |
138 hp / 101 kw
(-20%) |
+27% | 28 hp / 20 kw | 28 hp / 20 kw | 62.7 points |
2.5 TDI |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
+55% | 24 hp / 18 kw | 24 hp / 18 kw | 48 points |
Vehicle | 2.2 Turbo CAT |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
165 hp / 121 kw
(-5%) |
Power to torque ratio | 31 % |
Power per passenger | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75 points |
Vehicle | 2.3 |
Power (difference from average) |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 59.1 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 D |
Power (difference from average) |
70 hp / 51 kw
(-60%) |
Power to torque ratio | 43 % |
Power per passenger | 14 hp / 10 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 14 hp / 10 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 35 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | 38 % |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 50 points |
Vehicle | 2.4 D |
Power (difference from average) |
82 hp / 60 kw
(-53%) |
Power to torque ratio | 50 % |
Power per passenger | 16 hp / 12 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 16 hp / 12 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 34.2 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 CAT |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | 37 % |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 50 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 E CAT |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 33 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 57.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 TD |
Power (difference from average) |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
Power to torque ratio | 48 % |
Power per passenger | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 50 points |
Vehicle | 2.2 |
Power (difference from average) |
138 hp / 101 kw
(-20%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 28 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 62.7 points |
Vehicle | 2.3 CAT |
Power (difference from average) |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 59.1 points |
Vehicle | 2.2 CAT |
Power (difference from average) |
138 hp / 101 kw
(-20%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 28 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 62.7 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 TDI |
Power (difference from average) |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
Power to torque ratio | 55 % |
Power per passenger | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 48 points |
In 1988 Audi 100 horsepower was between 70 and 165 hp or 51 and 121 kW.
Audi 100 horsepower to weight ratio in 1988 is shown in the chart.
Audi 100 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2 Turbo |
165 hp / 121 kw
(-5%) |
+31% | 33 hp / 24 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 75 points |
2.4 D |
82 hp / 60 kw
(-53%) |
+50% | 16 hp / 12 kw | 16 hp / 12 kw | 34.2 points |
2.3 E CAT |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
+28% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 59.1 points |
2.3 E |
133 hp / 98 kw
(-23%) |
+28% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 57.8 points |
2.2 E |
138 hp / 101 kw
(-20%) |
+27% | 28 hp / 20 kw | 28 hp / 20 kw | 62.7 points |
2.5 TDI |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
+55% | 24 hp / 18 kw | 24 hp / 18 kw | 48 points |
2.0 D |
70 hp / 51 kw
(-60%) |
+43% | 14 hp / 10 kw | 14 hp / 10 kw | 35 points |
1.8 |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
+40% | 18 hp / 13 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 50 points |
2.0 D Turbo |
87 hp / 64 kw
(-50%) |
+49% | 17 hp / 13 kw | 17 hp / 13 kw | 43.5 points |
2.2 Turbo CAT |
165 hp / 121 kw
(-5%) |
+31% | 33 hp / 24 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 75 points |
1.8 CAT |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
+37% | 18 hp / 13 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 50 points |
2.2 CAT |
138 hp / 101 kw
(-20%) |
+27% | 28 hp / 20 kw | 28 hp / 20 kw | 62.7 points |
2.0 E |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+32% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 57.5 points |
2.3 |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
+28% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 59.1 points |
2.0 E CAT |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+33% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 57.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.2 Turbo |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
165 hp / 121 kw
(-5%) |
Power to torque ratio | 31 % |
Power per passenger | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75 points |
Vehicle | 2.4 D |
Power (difference from average) |
82 hp / 60 kw
(-53%) |
Power to torque ratio | 50 % |
Power per passenger | 16 hp / 12 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 16 hp / 12 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 34.2 points |
Vehicle | 2.3 E CAT |
Power (difference from average) |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 59.1 points |
Vehicle | 2.3 E |
Power (difference from average) |
133 hp / 98 kw
(-23%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 57.8 points |
Vehicle | 2.2 E |
Power (difference from average) |
138 hp / 101 kw
(-20%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 28 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 62.7 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 TDI |
Power (difference from average) |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
Power to torque ratio | 55 % |
Power per passenger | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 48 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 D |
Power (difference from average) |
70 hp / 51 kw
(-60%) |
Power to torque ratio | 43 % |
Power per passenger | 14 hp / 10 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 14 hp / 10 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 35 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | 40 % |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 50 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 D Turbo |
Power (difference from average) |
87 hp / 64 kw
(-50%) |
Power to torque ratio | 49 % |
Power per passenger | 17 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 17 hp / 13 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 43.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.2 Turbo CAT |
Power (difference from average) |
165 hp / 121 kw
(-5%) |
Power to torque ratio | 31 % |
Power per passenger | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 CAT |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | 37 % |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 50 points |
Vehicle | 2.2 CAT |
Power (difference from average) |
138 hp / 101 kw
(-20%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 28 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 62.7 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 E |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 57.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.3 |
Power (difference from average) |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 59.1 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 E CAT |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 33 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 57.5 points |
In 1982 Audi 100 horsepower was between 70 and 165 hp or 51 and 121 kW.
Audi 100 horsepower to weight ratio in 1982 is shown in the chart.
Audi 100 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 TD |
87 hp / 64 kw
(-50%) |
+49% | 17 hp / 13 kw | 17 hp / 13 kw | 43.5 points |
2.2 |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+30% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 52.3 points |
1.8 |
88 hp / 65 kw
(-49%) |
- | 18 hp / 13 kw | - | - |
2.0 CAT |
113 hp / 83 kw
(-35%) |
+32% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 56.5 points |
1.8 CAT |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
+35% | 18 hp / 13 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 50 points |
2.1 |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
+24% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 64.8 points |
2.2 Turbo CAT |
165 hp / 121 kw
(-5%) |
+31% | 33 hp / 24 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 75 points |
2.0 D |
70 hp / 51 kw
(-60%) |
+43% | 14 hp / 10 kw | 14 hp / 10 kw | 35 points |
2.2 E |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
+36% | 24 hp / 18 kw | 24 hp / 18 kw | 54.5 points |
2.0 E |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+32% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 57.5 points |
2.2 Turbo |
165 hp / 121 kw
(-5%) |
+31% | 33 hp / 24 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 75 points |
1.9 |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
+33% | 20 hp / 15 kw | 20 hp / 15 kw | 52.6 points |
2.3 |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
+28% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 59.1 points |
2.3 E |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
+28% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 59.1 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 TD |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
87 hp / 64 kw
(-50%) |
Power to torque ratio | 49 % |
Power per passenger | 17 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 17 hp / 13 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 43.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.2 |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 52.3 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Power (difference from average) |
88 hp / 65 kw
(-49%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 CAT |
Power (difference from average) |
113 hp / 83 kw
(-35%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 56.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 CAT |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | 35 % |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 50 points |
Vehicle | 2.1 |
Power (difference from average) |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 64.8 points |
Vehicle | 2.2 Turbo CAT |
Power (difference from average) |
165 hp / 121 kw
(-5%) |
Power to torque ratio | 31 % |
Power per passenger | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 D |
Power (difference from average) |
70 hp / 51 kw
(-60%) |
Power to torque ratio | 43 % |
Power per passenger | 14 hp / 10 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 14 hp / 10 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 35 points |
Vehicle | 2.2 E |
Power (difference from average) |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
Power to torque ratio | 36 % |
Power per passenger | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 54.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 E |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 57.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.2 Turbo |
Power (difference from average) |
165 hp / 121 kw
(-5%) |
Power to torque ratio | 31 % |
Power per passenger | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75 points |
Vehicle | 1.9 |
Power (difference from average) |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
Power to torque ratio | 33 % |
Power per passenger | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 52.6 points |
Vehicle | 2.3 |
Power (difference from average) |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 59.1 points |
Vehicle | 2.3 E |
Power (difference from average) |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 59.1 points |
In 1982 Audi 100 horsepower was between 70 and 165 hp or 51 and 121 kW.
Audi 100 horsepower to weight ratio in 1982 is shown in the chart.
Audi 100 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 |
88 hp / 65 kw
(-49%) |
+40% | 18 hp / 13 kw | 22 hp / 16 kw | 48.9 points |
2.3 E |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
+28% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 59.1 points |
1.9 |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
+33% | 20 hp / 15 kw | 20 hp / 15 kw | 52.6 points |
2.0 |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+32% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 57.5 points |
2.2 |
138 hp / 101 kw
(-20%) |
+27% | 28 hp / 20 kw | 28 hp / 20 kw | 62.7 points |
2.2 E |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
+30% | 24 hp / 18 kw | 24 hp / 18 kw | 54.5 points |
2.2 E Turbo |
165 hp / 121 kw
(-5%) |
+31% | 33 hp / 24 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 75 points |
2.0 D Turbo |
87 hp / 64 kw
(-50%) |
+49% | 17 hp / 13 kw | 17 hp / 13 kw | 43.5 points |
2.2 Turbo |
165 hp / 121 kw
(-5%) |
+31% | 33 hp / 24 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 75 points |
2.0 D |
70 hp / 51 kw
(-60%) |
+43% | 14 hp / 10 kw | 14 hp / 10 kw | 35 points |
2.1 |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
+24% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 64.8 points |
2.3 |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
+28% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 59.1 points |
2.2 CAT |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+30% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 52.3 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
88 hp / 65 kw
(-49%) |
Power to torque ratio | 40 % |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 48.9 points |
Vehicle | 2.3 E |
Power (difference from average) |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 59.1 points |
Vehicle | 1.9 |
Power (difference from average) |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
Power to torque ratio | 33 % |
Power per passenger | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 52.6 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 57.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.2 |
Power (difference from average) |
138 hp / 101 kw
(-20%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 28 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 62.7 points |
Vehicle | 2.2 E |
Power (difference from average) |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 54.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.2 E Turbo |
Power (difference from average) |
165 hp / 121 kw
(-5%) |
Power to torque ratio | 31 % |
Power per passenger | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 D Turbo |
Power (difference from average) |
87 hp / 64 kw
(-50%) |
Power to torque ratio | 49 % |
Power per passenger | 17 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 17 hp / 13 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 43.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.2 Turbo |
Power (difference from average) |
165 hp / 121 kw
(-5%) |
Power to torque ratio | 31 % |
Power per passenger | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 D |
Power (difference from average) |
70 hp / 51 kw
(-60%) |
Power to torque ratio | 43 % |
Power per passenger | 14 hp / 10 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 14 hp / 10 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 35 points |
Vehicle | 2.1 |
Power (difference from average) |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 64.8 points |
Vehicle | 2.3 |
Power (difference from average) |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 59.1 points |
Vehicle | 2.2 CAT |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 52.3 points |
In 1979 Audi 100 horsepower was between 70 and 115 hp or 51 and 85 kW.
Audi 100 horsepower to weight ratio in 1979 is shown in the chart.
Audi 100 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.1 L |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+29% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 54.8 points |
1.6 L |
85 hp / 63 kw
(-51%) |
+30% | 17 hp / 13 kw | 21 hp / 16 kw | 53.1 points |
2.0 D |
70 hp / 51 kw
(-60%) |
+43% | 14 hp / 10 kw | 14 hp / 10 kw | 35 points |
1.9 |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
+32% | 20 hp / 15 kw | 20 hp / 15 kw | 52.6 points |
Vehicle | 2.1 L |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 29 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 54.8 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 L |
Power (difference from average) |
85 hp / 63 kw
(-51%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 17 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 21 hp / 16 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 53.1 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 D |
Power (difference from average) |
70 hp / 51 kw
(-60%) |
Power to torque ratio | 43 % |
Power per passenger | 14 hp / 10 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 14 hp / 10 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 35 points |
Vehicle | 1.9 |
Power (difference from average) |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 52.6 points |
In 1979 Audi 100 horsepower was between 70 and 115 hp or 51 and 85 kW.
Audi 100 horsepower to weight ratio in 1979 is shown in the chart.
Audi 100 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.9 |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
+32% | 20 hp / 15 kw | 20 hp / 15 kw | 52.6 points |
2.0 D |
70 hp / 51 kw
(-60%) |
+43% | 14 hp / 10 kw | 14 hp / 10 kw | 35 points |
2.1 L |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+29% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 54.8 points |
1.6 L |
85 hp / 63 kw
(-51%) |
+30% | 17 hp / 13 kw | 21 hp / 16 kw | 53.1 points |
Vehicle | 1.9 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 52.6 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 D |
Power (difference from average) |
70 hp / 51 kw
(-60%) |
Power to torque ratio | 43 % |
Power per passenger | 14 hp / 10 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 14 hp / 10 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 35 points |
Vehicle | 2.1 L |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 29 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 54.8 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 L |
Power (difference from average) |
85 hp / 63 kw
(-51%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 17 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 21 hp / 16 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 53.1 points |
In 1977 Audi 100 horsepower was between 70 and 115 hp or 51 and 85 kW.
Audi 100 horsepower to weight ratio in 1977 is shown in the chart.
Audi 100 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.1 L |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+29% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 54.8 points |
2.0 LS |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+30% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 57.5 points |
1.6 L |
85 hp / 63 kw
(-51%) |
+30% | 17 hp / 13 kw | 21 hp / 16 kw | 53.1 points |
2.0 D |
70 hp / 51 kw
(-60%) |
+43% | 14 hp / 10 kw | 14 hp / 10 kw | 35 points |
Vehicle | 2.1 L |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 29 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 54.8 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 LS |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 57.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 L |
Power (difference from average) |
85 hp / 63 kw
(-51%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 17 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 21 hp / 16 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 53.1 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 D |
Power (difference from average) |
70 hp / 51 kw
(-60%) |
Power to torque ratio | 43 % |
Power per passenger | 14 hp / 10 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 14 hp / 10 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 35 points |
In 1976 Audi 100 horsepower was between 70 and 136 hp or 51 and 100 kW.
Audi 100 horsepower to weight ratio in 1976 is shown in the chart.
Audi 100 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.1 L |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
+25% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 64.8 points |
2.0 D |
70 hp / 51 kw
(-60%) |
+43% | 14 hp / 10 kw | 14 hp / 10 kw | 35 points |
2.0 LS |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+30% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 57.5 points |
1.6 L |
85 hp / 63 kw
(-51%) |
+30% | 17 hp / 13 kw | 21 hp / 16 kw | 53.1 points |
Vehicle | 2.1 L |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 64.8 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 D |
Power (difference from average) |
70 hp / 51 kw
(-60%) |
Power to torque ratio | 43 % |
Power per passenger | 14 hp / 10 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 14 hp / 10 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 35 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 LS |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 57.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 L |
Power (difference from average) |
85 hp / 63 kw
(-51%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 17 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 21 hp / 16 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 53.1 points |
In 1974 Audi 100 horsepower was between 85 and 112 hp or 63 and 82 kW.
Audi 100 horsepower to weight ratio in 1974 is shown in the chart.
Audi 100 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 |
85 hp / 63 kw
(-51%) |
+30% | 17 hp / 13 kw | 21 hp / 16 kw | 53.1 points |
1.8 |
85 hp / 63 kw
(-51%) |
+37% | 17 hp / 13 kw | 21 hp / 16 kw | 47.2 points |
1.8 LS |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
+33% | 20 hp / 15 kw | 25 hp / 19 kw | 55.6 points |
1.9 GL |
112 hp / 82 kw
(-35%) |
+30% | 22 hp / 16 kw | 28 hp / 21 kw | 58.9 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
85 hp / 63 kw
(-51%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 17 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 21 hp / 16 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 53.1 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Power (difference from average) |
85 hp / 63 kw
(-51%) |
Power to torque ratio | 37 % |
Power per passenger | 17 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 21 hp / 16 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 47.2 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 LS |
Power (difference from average) |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
Power to torque ratio | 33 % |
Power per passenger | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 25 hp / 19 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 55.6 points |
Vehicle | 1.9 GL |
Power (difference from average) |
112 hp / 82 kw
(-35%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 58.9 points |
In 1970 Audi 100 horsepower was 112 hp or 82 kW
Audi 100 horsepower to weight ratio in 1970 is shown in the chart.
Audi 100 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.9 |
112 hp / 82 kw
(-35%) |
+30% | 28 hp / 21 kw | 28 hp / 21 kw | 58.9 points |
Vehicle | 1.9 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
112 hp / 82 kw
(-35%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 58.9 points |
In 1968 Audi 100 horsepower was between 85 and 112 hp or 63 and 82 kW.
Audi 100 horsepower to weight ratio in 1968 is shown in the chart.
Audi 100 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 LS |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
+33% | 20 hp / 15 kw | 25 hp / 19 kw | 55.6 points |
1.9 LS |
92 hp / 68 kw
(-47%) |
+39% | 18 hp / 14 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 48.4 points |
1.9 GL |
112 hp / 82 kw
(-35%) |
+30% | 22 hp / 16 kw | 28 hp / 21 kw | 58.9 points |
1.8 |
85 hp / 63 kw
(-51%) |
+37% | 17 hp / 13 kw | 21 hp / 16 kw | 47.2 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 LS |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
Power to torque ratio | 33 % |
Power per passenger | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 25 hp / 19 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 55.6 points |
Vehicle | 1.9 LS |
Power (difference from average) |
92 hp / 68 kw
(-47%) |
Power to torque ratio | 39 % |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 14 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 48.4 points |
Vehicle | 1.9 GL |
Power (difference from average) |
112 hp / 82 kw
(-35%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 58.9 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Power (difference from average) |
85 hp / 63 kw
(-51%) |
Power to torque ratio | 37 % |
Power per passenger | 17 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 21 hp / 16 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 47.2 points |