In 1987 Alfa Romeo 164 horsepower was between 125 and 232 hp or 92 and 171 kW.
Alfa Romeo 164 horsepower to weight ratio in 1987 is shown in the chart.
Alfa Romeo 164 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 TD |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
+57% | 25 hp / 18 kw | 31 hp / 23 kw | 50 points |
2.0 T.S. |
146 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
+24% | 29 hp / 21 kw | 37 hp / 27 kw | 73 points |
3.0 24V Q4 |
228 hp / 168 kw
(+32%) |
+19% | 46 hp / 34 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 76 points |
3.0 V6 |
184 hp / 135 kw
(+6%) |
+28% | 37 hp / 27 kw | 31 hp / 23 kw | 61.3 points |
3.0 24V |
210 hp / 154 kw
(+21%) |
+21% | 42 hp / 31 kw | 35 hp / 26 kw | 70 points |
2.0 Turbo |
175 hp / 129 kw
(+1%) |
+34% | 35 hp / 26 kw | 44 hp / 32 kw | 87.5 points |
3.0 24V QV |
232 hp / 171 kw
(+34%) |
+17% | 46 hp / 34 kw | 39 hp / 29 kw | 77.3 points |
3.0 i V6 24V |
230 hp / 169 kw
(+33%) |
+19% | 46 hp / 34 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 76.7 points |
2.5 V6 |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
- | 33 hp / 24 kw | - | - |
2.0 V6 Turbo |
201 hp / 148 kw
(+16%) |
+26% | 40 hp / 30 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 100.5 points |
3.0 i.e. QV |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
+26% | 40 hp / 29 kw | 33 hp / 25 kw | 66.7 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 TD |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 31 hp / 23 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 50 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 T.S. |
Power (difference from average) |
146 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 37 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 73 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 24V Q4 |
Power (difference from average) |
228 hp / 168 kw
(+32%) |
Power to torque ratio | 19 % |
Power per passenger | 46 hp / 34 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 76 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
184 hp / 135 kw
(+6%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 37 hp / 27 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 31 hp / 23 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 61.3 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 24V |
Power (difference from average) |
210 hp / 154 kw
(+21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 21 % |
Power per passenger | 42 hp / 31 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 Turbo |
Power (difference from average) |
175 hp / 129 kw
(+1%) |
Power to torque ratio | 34 % |
Power per passenger | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 44 hp / 32 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 87.5 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 24V QV |
Power (difference from average) |
232 hp / 171 kw
(+34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 17 % |
Power per passenger | 46 hp / 34 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 39 hp / 29 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 77.3 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 i V6 24V |
Power (difference from average) |
230 hp / 169 kw
(+33%) |
Power to torque ratio | 19 % |
Power per passenger | 46 hp / 34 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 76.7 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 V6 Turbo |
Power (difference from average) |
201 hp / 148 kw
(+16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 40 hp / 30 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 100.5 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 i.e. QV |
Power (difference from average) |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 66.7 points |